China Trade Dress and Unfair Competition Law
China Brand Protection: Trade Dress and Unfair Competition. Learn how to protect your brand's unique look and feel. Get expert legal guidance here.
Home | China Law Blog | China Trade Dress and Unfair Competition Law Close your eyes, and imagine that when you open them you have been magically transported to another country and you are inside a McDonald's. How do you know you're in a McDonald's? Surely you would know without having to see the name McDonald's or the famous Golden Arches logo. Would you even know that you were in a different country? Probably not – and that’s exactly how McDonald's wants it. A Mickey D's has a certain look and feel, which is easily and immediately identifiable. The look and feel of products or services are considered “trade dress.” In the United States, trade dress is considered a symbol or device under trademark law, and can be registered and enforced just like any other trademark. And you better believe companies enforce their trade dress rights. In China, trade dress is not well defined and not given specific protection as such. Conceptually, trade dress in China incorporates IP elements that don't fit neatly under the rubric of trademark, copyright, or patent, and to the extent trade dress is protected in China, it is via China's Anti-Unfair Competition Law (AUCL). However, insofar as it applies to trade dress, the AUCL is not particularly strong, only applies to "famous" products and services, and doesn't have a mechanism for registration. In other words, you can only enforce trade dress rights by taking administrative or legal action. While there have been some interesting trade dress cases coming out of China in recent years, for most brands it is not a realistic option, and the good ole trio of trademarks, copyrights, and patents remains the way to go. This said, for brands that are getting very popular in China, trade dress may present one more protection avenue. It is also worth remembering that concepts such as fame are not static: Think of everyone and everything that is famous today but was not ten years ago. Trademarks that were not considered "well-known" a few years ago might qualify for protection as such in the China of today. As brands keep a pulse on their growing recognition, the legal implications should be kept in mind. A trade dress infringement lawsuit that would have seemed a bridge too far a few years ago may be plausible now. As a final note, this is one more example of why it is critical to keep IP protection considerations in mind when it comes to branding. While some brands obviously do an excellent job in this regard, some international brands get sloppy, especially when the work with local partners. I once attended an event at a European brand's hotel in Zhengzhou. It did not look at all like other other properties belonging to that brand, to the point I had to confirm it was a genuine property on the company's website. For obvious reasons, such inconsistencies hinder brand protection efforts, in the same way that using different trademarks on different products would. Check Out Our China Law Services Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn E-mail Comment Fred Rocafort Fred leads Harris Sliwoski’s intellectual property practice and is the coordinator of the firm’s international team. Much of Fred’s practice consists of helping cannabis businesses protect their brands. He also works with entrepreneurs and companies entering the Web3 space, a new frontier for IP law. Prior to joining Harris Sliwoski, Fred worked overseas for more than a decade, in both government and private sector roles. Fred is a regular contributor to the award-winning China Law Blog and Canna Law Blog. Fred began his career overseas as a U.S. consular officer in Guangzhou, China, where he advocated for fairer treatment of American companies and citizens in China and for stronger intellectual property rights enforcement. After entering the private sector, Fred worked at a Shanghai law firm as a foreign legal advisor and later joined one of the oldest American law firms in China, helping foreign companies navigate the Chinese legal environment. He also led the legal team at a Hong Kong-based brand protection consultancy, spending most of his time out in the field, protecting clients against counterfeiters and fraudsters in Greater China, Southeast Asia and Latin America. In addition to his IP work, as a native Spanish speaker, Fred works closely with different Harris Sliwoski teams on Latin America and Spain matters. Fred also provides advice to cannabis industry participants and other businesses on import and export transactions. Fred is an ardent supporter of FC Barcelona—and would be even in the absence of Catalan forebears who immigrated to Puerto Rico in the mid-1800s. Harris Sliwoski Attorney Read more posts [email protected] Read More Intellectual Property (IP) Related Posts September 15, 2026 Your AI-Drafted China Contract Says It Needs a Lawyer. Listen to It. September 11, 2026 Forensic Accountants in China Business Litigation: How True Numbers Can Tell the Wrong Story September 4, 2026 China NNN Agreement or Trademark Registration? You Usually Need Both September 1, 2026 AI Didn't Replace Lawyers. It Gave Us the 48-Page Contract. August 27, 2026 Do I Need a China NNN Agreement or a China Manufacturing Agreement? Usually Both. August 26, 2026 China’s New Overseas Investment Rules: Can Your Chinese Investor Actually Get the Money Out? August 24, 2026 International IP Protection for Startups: What to Protect and Where August 19, 2026 The Documents Are the International Deal August 19, 2026 China Supplier Fraud in Yiwu: Why We Recommended the Police, Not a Lawsuit August 17, 2026 China Trademark Registration: Why U.S. Companies Need More Than a Filing Agent August 10, 2026 Buying Expensive Equipment from China: Seven Questions to Answer Before You Pay August 7, 2026 DDP Shipping Risks: What Boise Cascade’s Guilty Plea Means for U.S. Buyers August 6, 2026 Protecting Your Artwork Internationally: What Artists Need to Do Before the Work Travels August 5, 2026 Your China Employee Signed the Vacation Policy. You Can Still Lose. July 29, 2026 The RedNote Contract Lesson for Companies Doing Business in China Leave a comment Cancel reply