Vintage Trademarks in China
Do you own a vintage trademark? Learn how classic brands and luxury goods navigate China's IP system for unique protection. Read the analysis.
Home | China Law Blog | Vintage Trademarks in China Table of Contents Toggle In Penn State Vintage Trademarks: Protecting the Future via the Past I reecently wrote a blog post that discussed a recent case in the United States, where Penn State University successfully defended its vintage sports logos against unauthorized use, highlighting the significance of safeguarding historic/vintage trademarks. Trademark protection for retro and vintage designshas also long been a concern for brands operating in China. I speak from experience, as a decade ago I represented an English Premier League team involved in a series of contentious trademark matters in China, some of which involved their older crests. Why Vintage Trademarks Matter in China Vintage trademarks often carry immense cultural and historical value. From sports teams to luxury brands, these logos represent more than just merchandise (though they do that as well)—they are symbols of legacy, identity, and continuity. And for sports teams in particular, connections to a glorious past often are critically importan for current and future profitability. Consider the case of Manchester United. According to Forbes, the Red Devils are the world's second most valuable team. This may seem odd for team that has not won the English league since the 2012-13 season (though they have found modest success in England's secondary competitions). Yet fans who have been around for a while will know that the 2012-13 was the team's 13th league title in 20 seasons—an amazing run. It should not come as a surprise that vintage trademarks are prime targets for counterfeiting and unauthorized use. Unauthorized use of historic logos not only dilutes their value but also misleads consumers and erodes trust in legitimate brands. Lessons from the Penn State Case Penn State's case against Vintage Brand serves as a pivotal example of how protecting vintage trademarks is essential for maintaining brand integrity. Just as Penn State sought to defend its historic sports logos, teams and other brands present in China must adopt similar vigilance to protect their own trademarks. The growing enthusiasm for retro sports merchandise, including products featuring vintage trademarks, underscores the need for robust trademark enforcement mechanisms. China has made significant strides in strengthening its intellectual property laws, but challenges remain. Counterfeit goods and unauthorized use of trademarks persist, particularly in online marketplaces. The Penn State case offers valuable lessons for how trademark owners in China can proactively safeguard their intellectual property: Comprehensive Trademark Registration: Just as Penn State ensured its vintage logos were registered trademarks, brands must prioritize registering all versions of their logos, including older and historic designs. Trademark registration is the foundation of any enforcement effort. Proactive Monitoring and Enforcement: Online marketplaces and social media platforms in China are common channels for counterfeit goods. Trademark owners must actively monitor these platforms and swiftly address infringements through takedown notices and legal action. Education and Consumer Awareness: Just as the Penn State case highlighted the risk of consumer confusion, educating Chinese consumers about the importance of purchasing licensed products can help mitigate the demand for counterfeit goods. The Role of International Brands in China For international brands with vintage trademarks, the Chinese market presents unique opportunities and risks. Retro logos of sports teams, luxury goods, and heritage brands are highly sought after by Chinese consumers. However, without proper trademark protections, these assets are vulnerable to exploitation. Brands entering the Chinese market should take the following steps: Local Trademark Registration: Ensure that all trademarks, including vintage designs, are registered with the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA). Partnerships with E-Commerce Platforms: Collaborate with platforms like Alibaba and JD.com to monitor and address counterfeit listings. Cultural Adaptation: Tailor enforcement strategies to align with Chinese consumer behavior and legal frameworks, ensuring that actions are effective and culturally appropriate. A Global Effort to Protect Heritage The Penn State case demonstrates the global importance of defending vintage trademarks. By taking proactive measures to safeguard these trademarks, organizations can preserve the integrity of their brands and maintain consumer trust. And trademark protection in China is an important part of the equation for brands manufacturing and/or selling in China—and even those that do not, as counterfeits made in China are a problem for brands, regardless of whether they also make genuine products in China. Conclusion The protection of vintage trademarks is not just a legal obligation—it’s a commitment to preserving history and culture. As teams embrace retro branding, the need for robust enforcement of vintage trademarks becomes increasingly urgent. By learning from cases like Penn State’s and implementing strong protections, brands can ensure their legacy endures for generations to come. Check Out Our China Law Services Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn E-mail Comment Fred Rocafort Fred leads Harris Sliwoski’s intellectual property practice and is the coordinator of the firm’s international team. Much of Fred’s practice consists of helping cannabis businesses protect their brands. He also works with entrepreneurs and companies entering the Web3 space, a new frontier for IP law. Prior to joining Harris Sliwoski, Fred worked overseas for more than a decade, in both government and private sector roles. Fred is a regular contributor to the award-winning China Law Blog and Canna Law Blog. Fred began his career overseas as a U.S. consular officer in Guangzhou, China, where he advocated for fairer treatment of American companies and citizens in China and for stronger intellectual property rights enforcement. After entering the private sector, Fred worked at a Shanghai law firm as a foreign legal advisor and later joined one of the oldest American law firms in China, helping foreign companies navigate the Chinese legal environment. He also led the legal team at a Hong Kong-based brand protection consultancy, spending most of his time out in the field, protecting clients against counterfeiters and fraudsters in Greater China, Southeast Asia and Latin America. In addition to his IP work, as a native Spanish speaker, Fred works closely with different Harris Sliwoski teams on Latin America and Spain matters. Fred also provides advice to cannabis industry participants and other businesses on import and export transactions. Fred is an ardent supporter of FC Barcelona—and would be even in the absence of Catalan forebears who immigrated to Puerto Rico in the mid-1800s. Harris Sliwoski Attorney Read more posts [email protected] Read More Intellectual Property (IP) Related Posts September 15, 2026 Your AI-Drafted China Contract Says It Needs a Lawyer. Listen to It. September 11, 2026 Forensic Accountants in China Business Litigation: How True Numbers Can Tell the Wrong Story September 4, 2026 China NNN Agreement or Trademark Registration? You Usually Need Both September 1, 2026 AI Didn't Replace Lawyers. It Gave Us the 48-Page Contract. August 27, 2026 Do I Need a China NNN Agreement or a China Manufacturing Agreement? Usually Both. August 26, 2026 China’s New Overseas Investment Rules: Can Your Chinese Investor Actually Get the Money Out? August 24, 2026 International IP Protection for Startups: What to Protect and Where August 19, 2026 The Documents Are the International Deal August 19, 2026 China Supplier Fraud in Yiwu: Why We Recommended the Police, Not a Lawsuit August 17, 2026 China Trademark Registration: Why U.S. Companies Need More Than a Filing Agent August 10, 2026 Buying Expensive Equipment from China: Seven Questions to Answer Before You Pay August 7, 2026 DDP Shipping Risks: What Boise Cascade’s Guilty Plea Means for U.S. Buyers August 6, 2026 Protecting Your Artwork Internationally: What Artists Need to Do Before the Work Travels August 5, 2026 Your China Employee Signed the Vacation Policy. You Can Still Lose. July 29, 2026 The RedNote Contract Lesson for Companies Doing Business in China Leave a comment Cancel reply