Traveling to China on Gender-Neutral Passports

Home | China Law Blog | Traveling to China on Gender-Neutral Passports Non-binary, intersex, and gender non-conforming Americans can now obtain passports with an X gender marker. Previously, the U.S. State Department had announced that applicants would be able to self-select their gender "as 'M' or 'F,'" irrespective of the gender specified in other identity documents, and without need for any medical certification. According to the U.S. Special Envoy to Advance the Human Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Intersex (LGBTQI+) Persons, "when a person obtains identity documents that reflect their true identity, they live with greater dignity and respect." The United States is not the first country to offer gender-neutral passports. Argentina, Australia, Canada, Nepal, and the Netherlands are some of the countries that already provided a third gender option on their passports. Nevertheless, the State Department's move is still of great import, constituting as strong a policy statement as the U.S. government can make on the issue of gender diversity. Far from being a message directed at national audiences only, the State Department's actions constitute an act of foreign policy. In essence, a passport is a formal communication between governments, requesting safe passage and assistance for their citizens. This is underscored by the fact that passports, at least in the case of the United States, are government property that must be returned on demand (22 CFR § 51.9). Consequently, the nonbinary gender choice being made by Americans who select X is one supported by the United States. Despite this powerful signal, however, Americans may encounter difficulties when using an X passport for overseas travel. Authorities in countries hostile to transgender rights may subject holders of such passports to harassment, and in some extreme cases may refuse to recognize the passports as valid. In other countries, hostile intent may be absent, but as a practical matter, their systems may not be designed to accept X gender designations. Online visa application forms or software used for immigration clearance might require a binary gender choice. Ham-fisted efforts by officials to find workarounds may result in uncomfortable situations. These scenarios appear unlikely to play out in China. For one, Chinese citizens can change gender markers on their identity documents, though only in cases where the person has undergone gender reassignment surgery (变性手术). Though this is different than allowing self-selection without a need for surgery and issuing gender-neutral documents, it indicates at least a somewhat progressive approach to gender diversity by China. In any case, even if gender-neutral identity documents are not available in China, authorities there can be counted on to respond in a practical way to the use of such documents by foreigners. It is important to remember that other countries have been issuing such passports for many years, and to date there have been no reports of problems in China (which, of course, does not mean there have not been any issues at all). This said, travelers who have previously visited China using travel documents that indicate a different gender than that on their current documents might still face difficulties. In those instances, concerns on the part of officials may lead to probing questioning that could be discomforting to some travelers. In addition, officials who do not regularly deal with foreigners may be less familiar with gender-neutral documents than their counterparts at major ports of entry and immigration offices. Meanwhile, Chinese government directives regarding treatment of gender-neutral documents might not apply to private actors such as hotel clerks and mobile phone vendors. Finally, it must be understood that these developments do not take place in a vacuum. The Chinese authorities may not be interested in giving a visitor a hard time because they have a gender-neutral passport, but they may want to do so on account of their nationality. In that case, bringing gender identity into the mix may be seen by Chinese government authorities as fair game. We shall see . . . Check Out Our China Law Services Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn E-mail Comment Fred Rocafort Fred leads Harris Sliwoski’s intellectual property practice and is the coordinator of the firm’s international team. Much of Fred’s practice consists of helping cannabis businesses protect their brands. He also works with entrepreneurs and companies entering the Web3 space, a new frontier for IP law. Prior to joining Harris Sliwoski, Fred worked overseas for more than a decade, in both government and private sector roles. Fred is a regular contributor to the award-winning China Law Blog and Canna Law Blog. Fred began his career overseas as a U.S. consular officer in Guangzhou, China, where he advocated for fairer treatment of American companies and citizens in China and for stronger intellectual property rights enforcement. After entering the private sector, Fred worked at a Shanghai law firm as a foreign legal advisor and later joined one of the oldest American law firms in China, helping foreign companies navigate the Chinese legal environment. He also led the legal team at a Hong Kong-based brand protection consultancy, spending most of his time out in the field, protecting clients against counterfeiters and fraudsters in Greater China, Southeast Asia and Latin America. In addition to his IP work, as a native Spanish speaker, Fred works closely with different Harris Sliwoski teams on Latin America and Spain matters. Fred also provides advice to cannabis industry participants and other businesses on import and export transactions. Fred is an ardent supporter of FC Barcelona—and would be even in the absence of Catalan forebears who immigrated to Puerto Rico in the mid-1800s. Harris Sliwoski Attorney Read more posts [email protected] Read More Legal News Related Posts September 15, 2026 Your AI-Drafted China Contract Says It Needs a Lawyer. Listen to It. September 11, 2026 Forensic Accountants in China Business Litigation: How True Numbers Can Tell the Wrong Story September 4, 2026 China NNN Agreement or Trademark Registration? You Usually Need Both September 1, 2026 AI Didn't Replace Lawyers. It Gave Us the 48-Page Contract. August 27, 2026 Do I Need a China NNN Agreement or a China Manufacturing Agreement? Usually Both. August 26, 2026 China’s New Overseas Investment Rules: Can Your Chinese Investor Actually Get the Money Out? August 24, 2026 International IP Protection for Startups: What to Protect and Where August 19, 2026 The Documents Are the International Deal August 19, 2026 China Supplier Fraud in Yiwu: Why We Recommended the Police, Not a Lawsuit August 17, 2026 China Trademark Registration: Why U.S. Companies Need More Than a Filing Agent August 10, 2026 Buying Expensive Equipment from China: Seven Questions to Answer Before You Pay August 7, 2026 DDP Shipping Risks: What Boise Cascade’s Guilty Plea Means for U.S. Buyers August 6, 2026 Protecting Your Artwork Internationally: What Artists Need to Do Before the Work Travels August 5, 2026 Your China Employee Signed the Vacation Policy. You Can Still Lose. July 29, 2026 The RedNote Contract Lesson for Companies Doing Business in China Leave a comment Cancel reply