China's New Online Publishing Rules
Navigating China's New Online Publishing Rules: Learn about the latest regulations and how they may impact your business. Get expert legal insights here.
Home | China Law Blog | China’s New Online Publishing Rules On March 10, 2016, the PRC government will impose new rules to govern online publishing in China. Under these new rules, all entities that intend to publish online in China must first obtain an Online Publishing Service Permit from SAPPRFT. The OPS Rules set out the conditions for obtaining the required permit. The Chinese government strictly regulates both traditional print publication and online publication in China and any publication done without the required permit or in violation of the terms of the permit is subject to severe sanctions. The OPES Rules are primarily directed at controlling Chinese entities that publish online in China and it only indirectly addresses activities of foreign entities. Foreign entities are already absolutely prohibited from any publication activities in China. I repeat: WFOEs, JVs and foreign entities are prohibited from carrying out any publication in China. Since this prohibition against foreign publication in China is absolute, the only role of the OPS Rules is to prohibit schemes designed to evade this absolute prohibition. Foreign commentators have consistently misunderstood the OPS Rules and the consequences that flow from those rules. The purpose of this post is to make clear the current status of foreign publication in China. 1. The new OPS Rules do not change the basic prohibition against publication in China by foreign owned entities. The OPS Rules merely confirm the prohibition that has always existed by making clear that "publishing" includes publishing "online." Our China lawyers never doubted this. 2. The OPS Rules are focused on regulating control of Chinese entities. The treatment of foreign entities is limited to measures intended to eliminate various schemes foreign owned entities have used to try to evade application of the prohibition. The basic scheme foreign entities have used has been to split ownership of the publishing license (held by the Chinese entity) and ownership and control of the technology and infrastructure required to carry out the publishing work (held by the foreign entity). These are the well known schemes of VIE structures and contract partner models. The new rules prohibit these evasive schemes by imposing the following two new requirements: a. The entity that holds the publishing license must have complete ownership and control of the publishing platform and technology. b. Any cooperation agreement between a Chinese entity and a foreign entity must be approved by SAPPRFT. By the term of the new rules, existing online publishing entities must apply for a new license under the terms of the new rules. It is doubtful any existing VIE structures will survive this process. 3. The rules vaguely broaden the definition of online publishing content, making it unclear how far the new rules will extend. However, the intent of the new rules is clear. Any material that would traditionally be published in print form is included. The unclear area applies only to new forms of publishing developed solely for the Internet with no traditional print analog. It is also unclear whether the new rules will apply to publication online that is little more than the standard company brochure and promotional materials. Simply because these publications are far more commercial than informational, we think they will survive. The main issue with the new rules is the clear prohibition of VIE and contract partner schemes designed to evade the foreign investment requirement. Though the new rules apply only to online publication, we see them as further demonstrating the PRC government's dislike of VIE and contract partner structures everywhere, including other online businesses in China. For example, the OPS Rules are not directed at online media publication such as film, TV and music because they are limited to the online provision of what traditionally would have been offered in print form. The issuance of the OPS Rules shows the PRC government is serious about eliminating the influence of foreign entities in China's publishing and online media. In assessing the impacts of these new rules, it is important to note that bulk of Internet businesses in China are foreign owned through VIE structures. If the Chinese regulators are now serious about eliminating the VIE structure, what will that mean? Check Out Our China Law Services Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn E-mail Comment China Law Blog The China Law Blog focuses on the practical aspects of Chinese law and how it impacts foreign companies that do business in or with China. The goal is to help readers understand what works and what does not work and what businesspeople can do to use the law to their advantage. China Law Blog's aim is to assist businesses already in China or planning to go into China, not to break new ground in legal theory or policy. Harris Sliwoski Blog Read more posts [email protected] Read More AI, Internet, Web3, and Blockchain, Basics of China Business Law, Legal News Related Posts September 15, 2026 Your AI-Drafted China Contract Says It Needs a Lawyer. Listen to It. September 11, 2026 Forensic Accountants in China Business Litigation: How True Numbers Can Tell the Wrong Story September 4, 2026 China NNN Agreement or Trademark Registration? You Usually Need Both September 1, 2026 AI Didn't Replace Lawyers. It Gave Us the 48-Page Contract. August 27, 2026 Do I Need a China NNN Agreement or a China Manufacturing Agreement? Usually Both. August 26, 2026 China’s New Overseas Investment Rules: Can Your Chinese Investor Actually Get the Money Out? August 24, 2026 International IP Protection for Startups: What to Protect and Where August 19, 2026 The Documents Are the International Deal August 19, 2026 China Supplier Fraud in Yiwu: Why We Recommended the Police, Not a Lawsuit August 17, 2026 China Trademark Registration: Why U.S. Companies Need More Than a Filing Agent August 10, 2026 Buying Expensive Equipment from China: Seven Questions to Answer Before You Pay August 7, 2026 DDP Shipping Risks: What Boise Cascade’s Guilty Plea Means for U.S. Buyers August 6, 2026 Protecting Your Artwork Internationally: What Artists Need to Do Before the Work Travels August 5, 2026 Your China Employee Signed the Vacation Policy. You Can Still Lose. July 29, 2026 The RedNote Contract Lesson for Companies Doing Business in China Leave a comment Cancel reply