China Trade and OFAC Sanctions

Home | China Law Blog | China Trade and OFAC Sanctions The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) enforces U.S. economic and trade sanctions. OFAC sanctions generally block all U.S. individuals and entities – including in some cases U.S. companies’ foreign subsidiaries – from transacting business with comprehensively sanctioned countries, such as Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Syria, or sanctioned individuals designated by OFAC as “Specially Designated Nationals” or “SDNs.” SDNs include individuals or entities that the United States has determined are terrorists, involved in illegal activities such as narcotics trafficking, or acting on behalf of sanctioned countries. U.S. entities and individuals are generally prohibited from exporting goods to, importing goods from, paying, or otherwise dealing with goods with prohibited countries or SDNs. OFAC sanctions may apply to non-U.S. individuals and entities in that the sanctions prohibit exporting goods currently in or that subsequently arrive in the United States to prohibited entities or SDNs. These sanctions may also apply to U.S. companies’ foreign branches and subsidiaries. Though China is not a comprehensively sanctioned country under OFAC, companies operating in China may still be subject to OFAC sanctions. As referenced above, U.S. companies’ foreign branches and subsidiaries in China may be subject to specific OFAC sanctions and U.S. individuals in China, or in any country, are subject to OFAC sanctions. Moreover, U.S. companies must not violate OFAC sanctions by undertaking activities that contribute to evading or avoiding the sanctions. For U.S. exporters, OFAC sanctions prohibit shipments to China with knowledge that the goods will be re-exported from China to a sanctioned country or SDN. Similarly, for U.S. importers, OFAC generally prohibits importing into the United States goods from a Chinese company that the importer knows or should know originated from a sanctioned country or were purchased from an SDN. By way of example, assume a U.S. company manufactures Product ABC and exports Product ABC to a company in China. At the time of export, the U.S. company either knows Product ABC will be re-exported from China to a sanctioned country or, based on the specific packaging or shipping instructions requested by the Chinese customer, is reasonably certain the product will be re- exported to the sanctioned country. Under these facts, OFAC would most likely determine that the U.S. company violated the OFAC sanction regulations. There is no gray area with OFAC sanctions – they are either followed or violated. OFAC violations may subject U.S. companies and individuals to serious civil and criminal penalties, not to mention the adverse publicity. U.S. companies and individuals trading with China should take appropriate actions to ensure their transactions comply with OFAC sanctions and any contemplated transaction that raises OFAC concerns or “red flags” should be carefully analyzed. Additionally, it will often make sense for your contracts with Chinese suppliers or customers to include language documenting these parties’ understanding of, and acknowledged compliance with, U.S. OFAC sanctions. Just because China itself is not under OFAC sanctions does not mean you should ignore those sanctions when doing business with China. Check Out Our China Law Services Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn E-mail Comment Adams Lee Adams Lee has more than twenty years’ experience providing strategic advice and legal guidance on complex international trade and administrative regulatory matters to US and foreign companies, trade associations, and foreign governments. He advises companies in a broad range of industries on international trade remedy and trade policy issues. Adams brings a wealth of knowledge to Harris Sliwoski’s international trade practice. He is adept at quickly evaluating strategic options and developing the best comprehensive legal approach in light of relevant policy and case law. Beyond achieving significant DOC and ITC results that improve his clients’ competitive position, Adams helps them understand complex trade issues so they can make well-informed business decisions. Harris Sliwoski Attorney Read more posts [email protected] Read More Basics of China Business Law, International Trade Law, Legal News Related Posts September 15, 2026 Your AI-Drafted China Contract Says It Needs a Lawyer. Listen to It. September 11, 2026 Forensic Accountants in China Business Litigation: How True Numbers Can Tell the Wrong Story September 4, 2026 China NNN Agreement or Trademark Registration? You Usually Need Both September 1, 2026 AI Didn't Replace Lawyers. It Gave Us the 48-Page Contract. August 27, 2026 Do I Need a China NNN Agreement or a China Manufacturing Agreement? Usually Both. August 26, 2026 China’s New Overseas Investment Rules: Can Your Chinese Investor Actually Get the Money Out? August 24, 2026 International IP Protection for Startups: What to Protect and Where August 19, 2026 The Documents Are the International Deal August 19, 2026 China Supplier Fraud in Yiwu: Why We Recommended the Police, Not a Lawsuit August 17, 2026 China Trademark Registration: Why U.S. Companies Need More Than a Filing Agent August 10, 2026 Buying Expensive Equipment from China: Seven Questions to Answer Before You Pay August 7, 2026 DDP Shipping Risks: What Boise Cascade’s Guilty Plea Means for U.S. Buyers August 6, 2026 Protecting Your Artwork Internationally: What Artists Need to Do Before the Work Travels August 5, 2026 Your China Employee Signed the Vacation Policy. You Can Still Lose. July 29, 2026 The RedNote Contract Lesson for Companies Doing Business in China Leave a comment Cancel reply