← Blog

Owed a LITTLE Money by a Chinese Manufacturer: Good Luck with That

Owed a small amount by a Chinese manufacturer? Learn why collecting small debts is financially impractical & what your best alternatives are.

Home | China Law Blog | Owed a LITTLE Money by a Chinese Manufacturer: Good Luck with That Table of Contents Toggle Small Debts Owed by China Manufacturers For over a decade, our China dispute lawyers have consistently received inquiries from companies that have paid between $3000 and $100,000 for product from a Chinese manufacturer and received either nothing in return or product that clearly is not up to snuff. These days, we are getting one or two of these emails a day. The writers of these emails want to know what they/we can do. In virtually all cases, the purchasing company has never visited the Chinese manufacturer to which they wired the funds, and in most instances, the Chinese manufacturer has stopped responding in any way to the bilked company's entreaties. Case Studies Highlighting the China Debt Issue The following are but three examples from this week alone. Case Study 1: An online retail company sent a Chinese manufacturer $60,000 for electronic toys, only to receive a shipment of woefully defective items, leaving them with unsellable stock and financial losses. Case Study 2: A small machinery company lost $80,000 in a wire transfer to a supposed manufacturer who vanished post-payment. It is pretty clear that the manufacturer never existed. Case Study 3: A fashion startup received clothing that was vastly inferior to the samples they had been provided. After paying $35,000, they found the manufacturer unresponsive. The writers of these emails all want to know what they/we can do (I am repeating this for effect!). Some of these bilked purchasers report the foreign manufacturer to the foreign Embassy in their home country and/or to their own embassy in China, but they virtually either get no response or a form letter back. They want to know what they/we can do. They often have a vague notion that our international litigation lawyers can get some embassy or government official somewhere to come down hard on the foreign manufacturer or that we would be happy to sue the foreign manufacturer on a contingency fee basis somewhere and bring them to heel. Legal Advice for Dealing with A China Manufacturer Below is a summary of the advice I typically provide to companies that have been wronged by Chinese manufacturers: We would be happy to review all the relevant documents in your case and write a demand letter in the native language of your manufacturer, but this seldom works. And before we do that, we will need to do at least some basic research to determine whether the manufacturer to which you sent your money even exists and, if it does exist, whether it has sufficient assets to be worth pursuing. For what this entails, I suggest you read this. I should also tell you that at least half the time in situations like this, there is no real company there. Your other alternative is to have us find the right lawyer in the city in which your manufacturer is located who speaks English and will sue on your behalf. Or you can spend way more than the amount at stake warrants and sue in your home country and then try to attach any assets this manufacturer might have in your home country, but they almost certainly have none. Or you can hire a lawyer in the country in which your manufacturer is located to try to get whatever judgment you get enforced over there. You might also try to find an international debt collection agency to take this on, but my understanding is that few if any will be interested. We will charge you hourly to review your documents and draft a short memo setting out your best options. If you hire a Chinese law firm to sue your manufacturer in its home country, you will almost certainly need to pay them and pay relatively high filing fees. The fact that you did everything with just a purchase order (and not with a China-centric manufacturing contract) means there is a good chance you will not prevail if you do sue. I would be remiss if I did not also mention that before we do anything that will anger anyone in China, we should make sure there is nothing the angry Chinese company can do to mess with (or even destroy) the business or manufacturing you are doing in China. This usually involves our making sure everything you are doing in China is being done legally (you would be surprised at how often this is not the case) and making sure that your intellectual property assets are not at risk in China due to failures on your part to register them in China. Going through the above will not come cheaply. In other words, it is not looking good for you right now and maybe the best thing you can do is mark this all down to experience and be more wary about doing business with China in the future. Online Product Platform Risks Many mistakenly believe that platforms like Alibaba provide a safety net against fraud and poor-quality products. Despite their expectations, legal recourse through these channels is often ineffective. Often, these companies have spent months pursuing fruitless complaints against these platforms and yet they still expect our China lawyers can quickly resolve their problems. Our attorneys have rigorously analyzed the carefully crafted terms of service on these platforms and have concluded that litigation is generally not a feasible option against these online marketplaces. These online product platforms know that the legal costs and low likelihood of success deter most claims from going to court. Consequently, they seldom offer to pay anything based on a demand letter. Though the websites of these online platforms often tout their "protection" policies, our experience paints a starkly different picture. When issues like receiving substandard goods or no goods at all arise, these online product platforms will distance themselves from the disputes. forcing their product buyers to navigate the aftermath alone. This prevalent misconception underscores the critical importance of conducting thorough due diligence and directly vetting suppliers, even when transactions occur through seemingly secure online platforms. I have often considered that the most effective legal challenge against some of these platforms could be a class action lawsuit based on misrepresentation. This belief stems from the way these websites promote "protection" while their terms and conditions clearly absolve them of nearly all responsibility. BOTTOM LINE: Don't let this happen to you. If the amount at stake is higher than that mentioned above, the situation is very different, and our international litigation team would be eager to try to assist. Check Out Our China Law Services Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn E-mail Comment Dan Harris Dan Harris is a founding member of Harris Sliwoski, an international law firm where he mostly represents companies doing business in emerging market countries. Most of his time is spent helping American and European companies navigate foreign countries by working with the international lawyers at his firm in setting up companies overseas (WFOEs, Subsidiaries, Rep Offices and Joint Ventures), drafting international contracts, protecting IP, and overseeing M&A transactions. In addition, Dan writes and speaks extensively on international law, with a focus on protecting foreign businesses in their overseas operations. He is also a prolific and widely-followed blogger, writing as the co-author of the award-winning China Law Blog. Harris Sliwoski Attorney Read more posts [email protected] Read More International Manufacturing, Litigation and Arbitration Related Posts September 15, 2026 Your AI-Drafted China Contract Says It Needs a Lawyer. Listen to It. September 11, 2026 Forensic Accountants in China Business Litigation: How True Numbers Can Tell the Wrong Story September 4, 2026 China NNN Agreement or Trademark Registration? You Usually Need Both September 1, 2026 AI Didn't Replace Lawyers. It Gave Us the 48-Page Contract. August 27, 2026 Do I Need a China NNN Agreement or a China Manufacturing Agreement? Usually Both. August 26, 2026 China’s New Overseas Investment Rules: Can Your Chinese Investor Actually Get the Money Out? August 24, 2026 International IP Protection for Startups: What to Protect and Where August 19, 2026 The Documents Are the International Deal August 19, 2026 China Supplier Fraud in Yiwu: Why We Recommended the Police, Not a Lawsuit August 17, 2026 China Trademark Registration: Why U.S. Companies Need More Than a Filing Agent August 10, 2026 Buying Expensive Equipment from China: Seven Questions to Answer Before You Pay August 7, 2026 DDP Shipping Risks: What Boise Cascade’s Guilty Plea Means for U.S. Buyers August 6, 2026 Protecting Your Artwork Internationally: What Artists Need to Do Before the Work Travels August 5, 2026 Your China Employee Signed the Vacation Policy. You Can Still Lose. July 29, 2026 The RedNote Contract Lesson for Companies Doing Business in China Leave a comment Cancel reply