China Trademarks: Register in More Classes, Take Down More Counterfeit Goods

Home | China Law Blog | China Trademarks: Register in More Classes, Take Down More Counterfeit Goods China's lack of an affirmative trademark use requirement allows trademark owners to register marks in more classes and covering more products and services than what they actually sell. This provides a useful tool to brands that want to go after counterfeits. While infringement generally starts with a brand's core lineup of products, often it quickly moves past that. By registering their trademarks in more classes, brands can ensure that only they get to legally take advantage of new ideas for products and services. For instance, branded cafes might not be a winning idea for fashion brands in their home markets, but they could represent a significant income stream in China. Moreover, all counterfeits have the potential to harm the brand, even if the brand has no interest in selling them. For example, a brand that prides itself on the craftsmanship of its, say, luxury handbags will not want low-quality shoes and belts bearing its marks. This is particularly the case if the use of their trademark is legal, hence allowing sales to take place more openly and in more reputable channels. Broader registration also allows the brand to participate in more trademark enforcement actions. Take the luxury handbag brand. Say the authorities raid a warehouse and find thousands of T-shirts bearing the brand's trademarks. If their registrations include Class 25, the brand will be able to prosecute the matter and inflict harm on the counterfeiter. To be sure, some would say, why would the brand care, if they are in the handbag business, not the T-shirt one. And indeed there are brands that take that view. But the savvier ones understand that those T-shirts (for which the brands will not get a single jiao), will only help whet appetites for counterfeit bags. Plus, again, the brand might come to realize there is a lucrative opportunity in the clothing space. Surely there is a market in China for ¥5000 bags, but there is a larger one for ¥500 tees. Also, not doing anything about those T-shirts might send the wrong message to law enforcement. There are brands that do not work cooperatively with the authorities, even when it comes to their core products. In some cases, these brands feel cases involving small seizure amounts are not worth prosecuting. Others just do not bother learning how the system works. Either way, before too long, Chinese officials will lose patience. While these scenarios differ from one where the brand just does not have a registration in the relevant class, failures to cooperate could be misunderstood by officials as reflecting a broader disinterest in enforcement actions. If a brand knows there are going to be regular seizures of a particular product type, they might as well set themselves up to help anti-counterfeiting efforts. Registering in all 45 classes is not a realistic strategy for most companies, so when devising your China trademark strategy, brands should think creatively about goods and services they might sell one day. In addition, they should anticipate counterfeiters moves and register their trademarks in the classes where they are likely to see products that, while not directly taking market share, could have negative reputational impacts. Check Out Our China Law Services Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn E-mail Comment Fred Rocafort Fred leads Harris Sliwoski’s intellectual property practice and is the coordinator of the firm’s international team. Much of Fred’s practice consists of helping cannabis businesses protect their brands. He also works with entrepreneurs and companies entering the Web3 space, a new frontier for IP law. Prior to joining Harris Sliwoski, Fred worked overseas for more than a decade, in both government and private sector roles. Fred is a regular contributor to the award-winning China Law Blog and Canna Law Blog. Fred began his career overseas as a U.S. consular officer in Guangzhou, China, where he advocated for fairer treatment of American companies and citizens in China and for stronger intellectual property rights enforcement. After entering the private sector, Fred worked at a Shanghai law firm as a foreign legal advisor and later joined one of the oldest American law firms in China, helping foreign companies navigate the Chinese legal environment. He also led the legal team at a Hong Kong-based brand protection consultancy, spending most of his time out in the field, protecting clients against counterfeiters and fraudsters in Greater China, Southeast Asia and Latin America. In addition to his IP work, as a native Spanish speaker, Fred works closely with different Harris Sliwoski teams on Latin America and Spain matters. Fred also provides advice to cannabis industry participants and other businesses on import and export transactions. Fred is an ardent supporter of FC Barcelona—and would be even in the absence of Catalan forebears who immigrated to Puerto Rico in the mid-1800s. Harris Sliwoski Attorney Read more posts [email protected] Read More Intellectual Property (IP) Related Posts September 15, 2026 Your AI-Drafted China Contract Says It Needs a Lawyer. Listen to It. September 11, 2026 Forensic Accountants in China Business Litigation: How True Numbers Can Tell the Wrong Story September 4, 2026 China NNN Agreement or Trademark Registration? You Usually Need Both September 1, 2026 AI Didn't Replace Lawyers. It Gave Us the 48-Page Contract. August 27, 2026 Do I Need a China NNN Agreement or a China Manufacturing Agreement? Usually Both. August 26, 2026 China’s New Overseas Investment Rules: Can Your Chinese Investor Actually Get the Money Out? August 24, 2026 International IP Protection for Startups: What to Protect and Where August 19, 2026 The Documents Are the International Deal August 19, 2026 China Supplier Fraud in Yiwu: Why We Recommended the Police, Not a Lawsuit August 17, 2026 China Trademark Registration: Why U.S. Companies Need More Than a Filing Agent August 10, 2026 Buying Expensive Equipment from China: Seven Questions to Answer Before You Pay August 7, 2026 DDP Shipping Risks: What Boise Cascade’s Guilty Plea Means for U.S. Buyers August 6, 2026 Protecting Your Artwork Internationally: What Artists Need to Do Before the Work Travels August 5, 2026 Your China Employee Signed the Vacation Policy. You Can Still Lose. July 29, 2026 The RedNote Contract Lesson for Companies Doing Business in China Leave a comment Cancel reply