China Trademark Challenges Amid Geopolitical Uncertainties

Home | China Law Blog | China Trademark Challenges Amid Geopolitical Uncertainties Table of Contents Toggle China Trademarks and Global Political Conflicts Russia’s War and Its Impact on China Brands Russia's invasion of Ukraine highlights the brand risks international companies face when geopolitical conflicts force a market exit. Many companies that left Russia found their trademarks being used without their consent, leading to a devaluation of their brand. In particular, the Russia experience serves as a warning for brands operating in China. If political tensions cause a similar mass exodus, Chinese authorities may likewise disregard trademark rights. Companies should start preparing now. Russia's invasion of Ukraine "brought about notable changes in the landscape for foreign trademark holders and local entities in Russia," as noted in a recent cover article by Riikka Palmos in Trademark Lawyer. As international brands fled Russia, their "retailers and former partners have continued using trademarks despite ending the cooperation and prohibition of such use." Brands present in China need to consider the implications for their trademarks of a scenario in which they are forced to exit the Chinese market. In my experience advising numerous brands on their China trademark strategies, I've seen firsthand the difficulties of protecting intellectual property in China even during stable times. In times of conflict, these difficulties would likely multiply exponentially. Companies often underestimate these risks. Triggers for Brands Exiting China One such scenario involves actions by China on the international stage that could lead to sanctions (or stronger responses), with accompanying pressure on brands to cease doing business there. Hostilities against neighboring countries like Taiwan or the Philippines are probably the best example, given the parallels to Russia's aggression against Ukraine. Undoubtedly, for most brands, a decision to leave China would be tougher than one to quit Russia: China's population is ten times larger, with per capita income virtually identical. But for brands that cannot afford to entirely dismiss public opinion in markets like the United States and Europe, departure may be the least painful choice. And even if they wanted to stay, conditions on the ground might force their hand: American (and Australian, British, Japanese, etc.) brands might become targets of Chinese ire if their governments are actively supporting a war effort against China. Internal actions by Chinese authorities could also present scenarios necessitating an exit. A large portion of Western businesses currently projects a pro-China stance, but that could change if enough of their own start getting slapped with exit bans, or jailed, or taken hostage by creditors. Affected companies might demand solidarity from others in the industry, and in any case governments might take punitive action. The Interplay of Geopolitics and China Trademark Protection What could a China departure mean in practice for a brand's trademarks? 1. Continued Brand Use After Departure Mirroring what has happened in Russia, distributors and retailers might look for ways to continue selling the brand, relying on gray-market goods and/or counterfeits, possibly with the countenance of the Chinese authorities. If distributors and retailers persist in using a brand after its departure from China, that usage will likely undermine the brand's exclusivity and the trust customers place in it. Gray-market goods might not meet the brand's quality standards, leading to diminished brand reputation. Moreover, counterfeits could further erode trust as consumers might end up with inferior or even hazardous products under the brand's name. Over time, the brand could lose its value and reputation. 2. Increased Intellectual Property (IP) Theft Disgruntled former employees or those with less loyalty to the brand might be tempted to sell or share trade secrets, designs, or other intellectual property with competitors. This could further erode the brand's competitive advantage in the Chinese market and beyond. 3. Delay or Neglect in Legal Action Courts and government agencies tasked with trademark protection might slow-walk action against those who infringe the trademarks of brands who depart, or simply ignore complaints by these brands. A lack of urgency or complete neglect in enforcing trademark rights could lead to widespread infringements. This dilution can lead to significant financial losses, especially if counterfeit products flood the market. 4. Lawyers' Reluctance Lawyers may decline to represent brands whose actions are deemed hostile by China. The scarcity of willing lawyers might lead to increased legal fees for those few who are open to representing foreign brands. This could make legal action against counterfeiters financially no longer viable for some brands. 5. Customs Restrictions China Customs may not act against exports that infringe on the trademarks of blacklisted brands. Without the support of China Customs to prevent the export of infringing goods, counterfeit products could make their way to other markets globally. This not only affects the brand's image in China but could potentially harm its reputation on a global scale. 6. Staffing Challenges Retaining local staff, who often serve as vigilant observers on the ground in China, could become challenging for brands. These local professionals frequently contribute important insights into cultural nuances, consumer behaviors, and market dynamics. Without them, brands might struggle to identify infringements or understand local consumer sentiment. Prepare for Uncertain Times Though China is not Russia, international reactions to future actions by China could pose significant risks for foreign trademark holders. Brands should not wait for conflict to consider the possible China scenarios; they should start acting now to minimize the potential for negative consequences. Two key aspects that demand attention are securing proper trademark registrations and ensuring documented IP ownership. 1. Proper Trademark Registrations Securing a trademark isn’t just about filing for one; it’s about ensuring you file correctly, comprehensively, and in a timely manner. a. Country-specific Registrations A trademark registered in one country doesn’t automatically grant protection in another. Brands must register their trademarks in every country they operate in, especially in jurisdictions like China, which follow a "first-to-file" system. b. Comprehensive Filing Brands should consider registering not just their primary logo or brand name, but also any variations, sub-brands, or key product names. This ensures a wider umbrella of protection. c. Periodic Renewals Trademark protection isn't eternal. Brands must keep track of renewal deadlines to maintain their rights. Lapses can result in a loss of protection, making brands vulnerable to infringement. 2. Documented IP Ownership Having solid documentation on your intellectual property is just as crucial as the IP itself. This documentation proves ownership, outlines rights and is essential during legal disputes. a. Clarity in Ownership For brands operating in partnerships or joint ventures, it’s pivotal to have clear documentation on who owns what. This prevents potential disputes and ambiguities in the future. b. Maintaining IP Portfolios Brands should maintain a consolidated and updated portfolio of all their intellectual properties. This should include registration certificates, renewal documents, and any correspondence related to IP rights. c. Licensing Agreements If you license your brand or any IP elements to other entities, ensure those agreements are ironclad, with clear terms on usage, duration, territories, and revocation clauses. d. Centralized Digital Repository Consider setting up a centralized digital repository for all your IP-related documentation, ensuring easy access and regular updates. Also, engage with legal professionals to audit and verify the robustness of your IP documentation periodically. Conclusion In today’s volatile geopolitical climate, proactive protection is the best defense. Though it may seem tedious, ensuring proper trademark registrations and well-documented IP ownership will prove invaluable in safeguarding a brand's most precious assets: its identity and reputation. With advanced preparation, brands can reduce their level of China exposure and safeguard their interests in case unpredictable political tensions or conflict suddenly force them to depart the Chinese market. Smart companies should be implementing contingency plans, so they are ready for whatever the future may hold. Though China will likely remain an integral part of most brands' global strategy, it should not remain the entirety. Is your brand prepared for shifting geopolitical landscapes? Check Out Our China Law Services Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn E-mail Comment Fred Rocafort Fred leads Harris Sliwoski’s intellectual property practice and is the coordinator of the firm’s international team. Much of Fred’s practice consists of helping cannabis businesses protect their brands. He also works with entrepreneurs and companies entering the Web3 space, a new frontier for IP law. Prior to joining Harris Sliwoski, Fred worked overseas for more than a decade, in both government and private sector roles. Fred is a regular contributor to the award-winning China Law Blog and Canna Law Blog. Fred began his career overseas as a U.S. consular officer in Guangzhou, China, where he advocated for fairer treatment of American companies and citizens in China and for stronger intellectual property rights enforcement. After entering the private sector, Fred worked at a Shanghai law firm as a foreign legal advisor and later joined one of the oldest American law firms in China, helping foreign companies navigate the Chinese legal environment. He also led the legal team at a Hong Kong-based brand protection consultancy, spending most of his time out in the field, protecting clients against counterfeiters and fraudsters in Greater China, Southeast Asia and Latin America. In addition to his IP work, as a native Spanish speaker, Fred works closely with different Harris Sliwoski teams on Latin America and Spain matters. Fred also provides advice to cannabis industry participants and other businesses on import and export transactions. Fred is an ardent supporter of FC Barcelona—and would be even in the absence of Catalan forebears who immigrated to Puerto Rico in the mid-1800s. Harris Sliwoski Attorney Read more posts [email protected] Read More Intellectual Property (IP) Related Posts September 15, 2026 Your AI-Drafted China Contract Says It Needs a Lawyer. Listen to It. September 11, 2026 Forensic Accountants in China Business Litigation: How True Numbers Can Tell the Wrong Story September 4, 2026 China NNN Agreement or Trademark Registration? You Usually Need Both September 1, 2026 AI Didn't Replace Lawyers. It Gave Us the 48-Page Contract. August 27, 2026 Do I Need a China NNN Agreement or a China Manufacturing Agreement? Usually Both. August 26, 2026 China’s New Overseas Investment Rules: Can Your Chinese Investor Actually Get the Money Out? August 24, 2026 International IP Protection for Startups: What to Protect and Where August 19, 2026 The Documents Are the International Deal August 19, 2026 China Supplier Fraud in Yiwu: Why We Recommended the Police, Not a Lawsuit August 17, 2026 China Trademark Registration: Why U.S. Companies Need More Than a Filing Agent August 10, 2026 Buying Expensive Equipment from China: Seven Questions to Answer Before You Pay August 7, 2026 DDP Shipping Risks: What Boise Cascade’s Guilty Plea Means for U.S. Buyers August 6, 2026 Protecting Your Artwork Internationally: What Artists Need to Do Before the Work Travels August 5, 2026 Your China Employee Signed the Vacation Policy. You Can Still Lose. July 29, 2026 The RedNote Contract Lesson for Companies Doing Business in China Leave a comment Cancel reply