← Blog

Is Vietnam the Next China

Explore why Vietnam may replicate China's growth and the challenges it faces. Stay informed with insights from Harris Sliwoski. Contact us for legal support.

Home | China Law Blog | China Is The Next China. Vietnam May Be The Next China Someday. Table of Contents Toggle The Next China: Why China May Still Be Its Own Successor Businesses worldwide are constantly searching for the next big opportunity, and for many, that means finding "the next China." But while countries like Vietnam and India are indeed on the rise, understanding where the real future growth lies requires a closer look. This post argues that the most promising successor to China's current economic engine might just be China itself, specifically its rapidly developing second-tier cities. Which Country Is the Next China? Just about every promising emerging market gets mentioned as a potential “next China.” The other BRICS—India, Brazil, and Russia—are perennial contenders. Poland, Mexico, Turkey, Thailand, and Malaysia also appear frequently on lists. But the country that continues to rise to the top of this conversation is Vietnam. Vietnam’s Economic Rise Since 1990, Vietnam has posted some of the world’s highest GDP growth rates. It’s become an increasingly popular manufacturing and sourcing destination, with many companies seeing it as a lower-cost alternative to China. Vietnam absolutely presents compelling business opportunities. But my pick for the “next China”? It's China itself—particularly for the next decade. China’s Second-Tier Cities: The Real "Next China"? When people refer to the next China, they’re usually thinking about duplicating the success stories of Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Beijing. From this perspective, China’s own second-tier cities—such as Tianjin, Qingdao, Dalian, Shenyang, and Chengdu—are poised to become the new engines of growth. These cities offer: Robust infrastructure Lower labor and operating costs Improving quality of life for foreign and domestic business stakeholders Most importantly, they benefit from the foundation laid by China’s first-tier cities—and they’re leveraging that to fuel their own rapid development. Why the China Model Is Hard to Copy I agree with this New York Times article which posits that there will be no next China for a very long time: The flavor of the moment is the "China model," whereby a controlling government carefully injects capitalism into its economy to spur exports and foreign investment. Yet few, perhaps none, of the countries who hope to emulate China's success have a real chance of doing so. In the past couple of years, the China model has apparently become the favorite of authoritarian regimes looking to enrich themselves while assuaging any restless citizens with the prospect of riches. Iran, Syria, and Vietnam jumped on the bandwagon early on. The article posits that "many different conditions led to China's success" and no other country has "them in the same combination." The so-called “China model”—a blend of centralized political control and carefully managed market liberalization—is being eyed by governments from Iran to Vietnam. But as the article notes, few countries have the full mix of attributes that made China’s rise possible. Here are just a few of those key factors: Political stability China has maintained a relatively stable internal and regional posture. In contrast, countries like Syria or Iran have faced international sanctions or ongoing regional conflicts. Government control and efficiency China’s centralized political structure allows for swift decision-making in areas like infrastructure development and foreign investment. In many democracies or less centralized regimes, policy implementation is far slower. Vast labor supply China’s urbanization continues to produce a steady stream of low-cost labor. Many other emerging markets—due to size or public health issues—can’t match this dynamic. Consumer market size China’s middle class is massive and growing. While India may rival China in population, very few other nations come close to the consumer potential China offers. Brands create entire product lines just for the Chinese market—something few countries can inspire. Is Vietnam a Viable Contender? Vietnam may come the closest to replicating China’s trajectory. With over 80 million people, a controlling government, relative stability, and growing trade relations, Vietnam ticks many boxes. But the comparison has limits: Corruption in Vietnam remains a major obstacle. Vietnam'siInfrastructure, while improving, lags far behind China’s. Vietnam's smaller size means its long-term scalability is more constrained. Conclusion is Still the "Next China" I’m a strong believer in Vietnam’s future. I think it will continue to grow, particularly as it deepens integration into the global economy and secures World Trade Organization (WTO) membership. But for many companies, Vietnam still isn’t a viable full-scale alternative due to infrastructure limitations and sector-specific barriers. China’s unique advantages are not easily duplicated. And with second-tier cities surging, China is not only the China of the past—but also very likely the China of the future. Check Out Our China Law Services Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn E-mail Comment Dan Harris Dan Harris is a founding member of Harris Sliwoski, an international law firm where he mostly represents companies doing business in emerging market countries. Most of his time is spent helping American and European companies navigate foreign countries by working with the international lawyers at his firm in setting up companies overseas (WFOEs, Subsidiaries, Rep Offices and Joint Ventures), drafting international contracts, protecting IP, and overseeing M&A transactions. In addition, Dan writes and speaks extensively on international law, with a focus on protecting foreign businesses in their overseas operations. He is also a prolific and widely-followed blogger, writing as the co-author of the award-winning China Law Blog. Harris Sliwoski Attorney Read more posts [email protected] Read More International Business, International Manufacturing Learn more about our International Manufacturing Law Practice Related Posts September 15, 2026 Your AI-Drafted China Contract Says It Needs a Lawyer. Listen to It. September 11, 2026 Forensic Accountants in China Business Litigation: How True Numbers Can Tell the Wrong Story September 4, 2026 China NNN Agreement or Trademark Registration? You Usually Need Both September 1, 2026 AI Didn't Replace Lawyers. It Gave Us the 48-Page Contract. August 27, 2026 Do I Need a China NNN Agreement or a China Manufacturing Agreement? Usually Both. August 26, 2026 China’s New Overseas Investment Rules: Can Your Chinese Investor Actually Get the Money Out? August 24, 2026 International IP Protection for Startups: What to Protect and Where August 19, 2026 The Documents Are the International Deal August 19, 2026 China Supplier Fraud in Yiwu: Why We Recommended the Police, Not a Lawsuit August 17, 2026 China Trademark Registration: Why U.S. Companies Need More Than a Filing Agent August 10, 2026 Buying Expensive Equipment from China: Seven Questions to Answer Before You Pay August 7, 2026 DDP Shipping Risks: What Boise Cascade’s Guilty Plea Means for U.S. Buyers August 6, 2026 Protecting Your Artwork Internationally: What Artists Need to Do Before the Work Travels August 5, 2026 Your China Employee Signed the Vacation Policy. You Can Still Lose. July 29, 2026 The RedNote Contract Lesson for Companies Doing Business in China Leave a comment Cancel reply