Registering Your Trademarks: A How-To Guide
Register your trademarks with the USPTO! This guide simplifies the process, identifies potential pitfalls, and offers expert tips.
Home | Canna Law Blog | Registering Your Trademarks: A How-To Guide Registering your trademarks is a critical step for protecting your brand - but it's definitely not easy to figure out without experience. Trademarks are unique identifiers, most often company or product names or logos, but slogans, hashtags, and even 3D shapes, sounds and scents can also constitute trademarks, if used in connection with specific products or services. Here's is a simple rundown of the process for registering your trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). While the process may seem straightforward, there can be lots of pitfalls, so it's always a good idea to consult with someone experienced in the process. Run a trademark search (also known as a clearance or screening). The goal is to identify registered or prior-applied trademarks that are identical or similar to yours, and could therefore prevent the registration of your trademark. USPTO's own searchable database (TESS) is the main tool used for this step. A search is not mandatory, but highly recommended to avoid unpleasant surprises as you proceed. Select an owner for the trademark. Sometimes the owner's identity is clear, but not always: An individual who does business through an LLC, for example, has the choice of applying in their own name or the LLC's. By the same token, this might be a good time to establish an LLC, though, again, as an individual you can own and register your trademarks. Identify the goods and/or services to be included in the application. Trademark rights are linked to specific goods and/or services: Use of a trademark in connection to garden plants does not generally give rise to rights over the same trademark in connection to, for example, cars. Goods and services are classified into 45 classes. USPTO filing fees are determined according to the number of classes listed on the application. There are several resources for determining the right trademark class, including the Trademark ID Manual, which also lists goods and services descriptions that have been approved by USPTO. You can customize descriptions, but will need to pay higher filing fees when registering your trademarks. NOTE that some cannabis-related goods and services are not eligible for federal trademark protection, on account of their unlawfulness under federal law. Registering your trademarks at the state level might be an option, which brings with it certain other benefits, including lower costs and shorter processing times. Complete the application for registration of your trademark, providing basic information about the owner, trademark, and goods and services, including specimens and dates of first use, in the case of trademarks already in use. In the case of logos and other marks with graphic elements (such as stylized versions of words), an image that meets USPTO's size and pixel requirements must be uploaded. Applications to register trademarks not currently in use can be filed (intent-to-use basis), but registration itself can only take place after the trademark is used. See Cannabis Trademarks: Don't Forget the Basics! for more information. Note that an application covers only one trademark. If you want to register, for example, both your company name and logo, registering your trademarks will require two separate applications to be filed. Pay the fee and submit. For applications using pre-approved goods and services descriptions, the fee is $250 per trademark class. For applications using customized goods and services descriptions, the fee is $350 per trademark class. It is taking USPTO 9-10 months to conduct its examination of applications. If there are no issues, the mark will be published for opposition, giving others 30 days to oppose your registration. If no opposition is filed within those 30 days, registration of your trademark will follow, generally within two months of the end of the opposition period. If there are issues that need to be addressed, such as problems with the goods and/or services descriptions, or likelihood of confusion with other trademarks, USPTO will issue an office action, normally giving you three months to respond. Should the issue be addressed successfully and the USPTO objections are overcome, the trademark will proceed to publication (see above). Once the mark is registered, you are done for five years, when you will need to present a Declaration of Use. The registration needs to be renewed every ten years, with a Declaration of Use accompanying the renewal. Registering your trademarks with USPTO is an essential move to safeguarding your brand. In turn, properly following the application steps outlined above is critical, to increase the chances of a successful application. To avoid delays, be sure to seek expert advice if you are unsure about a part of the process. Check Out Our Cannabis Law Services Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn E-mail Comment Fred Rocafort Fred leads Harris Sliwoski’s intellectual property practice and is the coordinator of the firm’s international team. Much of Fred’s practice consists of helping cannabis businesses protect their brands. He also works with entrepreneurs and companies entering the Web3 space, a new frontier for IP law. Prior to joining Harris Sliwoski, Fred worked overseas for more than a decade, in both government and private sector roles. Fred is a regular contributor to the award-winning China Law Blog and Canna Law Blog. Fred began his career overseas as a U.S. consular officer in Guangzhou, China, where he advocated for fairer treatment of American companies and citizens in China and for stronger intellectual property rights enforcement. After entering the private sector, Fred worked at a Shanghai law firm as a foreign legal advisor and later joined one of the oldest American law firms in China, helping foreign companies navigate the Chinese legal environment. He also led the legal team at a Hong Kong-based brand protection consultancy, spending most of his time out in the field, protecting clients against counterfeiters and fraudsters in Greater China, Southeast Asia and Latin America. In addition to his IP work, as a native Spanish speaker, Fred works closely with different Harris Sliwoski teams on Latin America and Spain matters. Fred also provides advice to cannabis industry participants and other businesses on import and export transactions. Fred is an ardent supporter of FC Barcelona—and would be even in the absence of Catalan forebears who immigrated to Puerto Rico in the mid-1800s. Harris Sliwoski Attorney Read more posts [email protected] Read More Federal law and policy, Intellectual Property/Branding Related Posts September 25, 2026 DEA Enforcement in a Changing Cannabis Landscape: Rescheduling, Hemp, and What Comes Next September 17, 2026 The Supreme Court May Decide if Cannabis-Related Residency Requirements are Unconstitutional September 16, 2026 A $31.8 Million Cannabis-Related Verdict That a Federal Court Wouldn’t Enforce September 15, 2026 Jason Adelstone Moderates Federal Cannabis Policy Discussion at IgniteIt Denver September 11, 2026 Medical Marijuana in Schedule III Survives Its First Major Challenge September 10, 2026 How to Acquire a Colorado Cannabis License September 4, 2026 The Intoxicating Hemp Products Ban Was Delayed a Month. Now What? August 31, 2026 Is the Global Shift to the Right Threatening International Cannabis Reforms? August 28, 2026 Oregon Cannabis Roundup: Fall 2026 August 26, 2026 Five Bills Every California Cannabis Operator Needs to Track in 2026 August 14, 2026 California Cannabis Contracts After Rescheduling: Why Your Contracts Need a Second Look August 4, 2026 DCC License Conversions After Rescheduling: How and When to Split A/M Licenses in California August 3, 2026 The Contradictions of Cannabis Law: From the United States to International Treaties July 28, 2026 What California Operators Must Do After Rescheduling: DEA Registration, License Restructuring, and 280E July 24, 2026 Medical Marijuana Schedule III Litigation: The D.C. Circuit's First Major Test Leave a comment Cancel reply