China Manufacturing Tips for Cannabis Brands

Home | Canna Law Blog | China Manufacturing Tips for Cannabis Brands Table of Contents Toggle We are seeing in an uptick in China-related matters involving cannabis brands. Here are three tips for cannabis brands that are getting their products made in China: 1. Sign a Contract As I recently wrote in our sister blog, "while having a contract provides no guarantee of smooth operations or favorable dispute resolution, a well-drafted agreement can mitigate many risks." Moreover, it "is almost guaranteed, though, is that if a dispute arises and you do not have a contract, you will have no chance of legal recourse in China." We see far too many companies doing business in China without proper contractual protection. In some cases, this is because they mistakenly assume a Chinese court would not enforce a contract anyway. Others assume that an exchange of emails and WhatsApp messages with their supplier would be considered a contract, if push came to shove. The bottom line is that Chinese courts regularly enforce written contracts. Moreover, the existence of such a contract greatly reduces the likelihood of a dispute, precisely because the Chinese supplier is likely to know that a breach of a written contract is very damning in the eyes of a local court. At the same time, in the absence of a written contract, it is almost certain that a legal dispute against a supplier will go nowhere. 2. Have a Plan B Relying on a single supplier is a very risky proposition, but more so when that supplier is in China. In addition to the inherent risks associated with depending on a single source, a supplier that knows itself to be indispensable could well decide to take advantage of the leverage it has. Ideally, a Plan B will involve a supplier in a country other than China. This will help guard against China-specific risks, such as possible disruptions to China trade in case of rising tensions between the United States (and its allies) and China. But even a Plan B that involves a different supplier in China is better than not having a Plan B. Taking the long view, the potentially business-saving upside of channeling 10% or 20% of production to a different supplier could well offset the associated costs. It could also help canna brands keep their suppliers on their toes, as they know there is always the potential for further production shifts depending on which supplier is offering better terms. If they wanted to, companies like Nike and Adidas could work with a handful of suppliers, yet they work with dozens, spread out over Asia (and beyond). Why do you think that is? 3. Register Your Trademarks and Other IP (in China) Even if you do not sell in China, there are compelling reasons to register your trademarks and other key intellectual property in China. More than anything, this will prevent others from registering it first, and then using it against you (potentially siccing the authorities on you for infringing on "their" IP). Others might be hitherto unknown parties, looking for a quick buck or actually thinking of using the IP themselves, but it could also be your own supplier, looking to have more leverage over you, or making provisions for possible departure on your part. Avoid troublesome scenarios by registering your cannabis brand IP in China now. Once you do that, record those IP rights with China Customs to have them be on the lookout for infringing goods leaving China. And of course make sure that your U.S. cannabis brand IP protections are complete and up-to-date, to the extent they are securable. Check Out Our Cannabis Law Services Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn E-mail Comment Fred Rocafort Fred leads Harris Sliwoski’s intellectual property practice and is the coordinator of the firm’s international team. Much of Fred’s practice consists of helping cannabis businesses protect their brands. He also works with entrepreneurs and companies entering the Web3 space, a new frontier for IP law. Prior to joining Harris Sliwoski, Fred worked overseas for more than a decade, in both government and private sector roles. Fred is a regular contributor to the award-winning China Law Blog and Canna Law Blog. Fred began his career overseas as a U.S. consular officer in Guangzhou, China, where he advocated for fairer treatment of American companies and citizens in China and for stronger intellectual property rights enforcement. After entering the private sector, Fred worked at a Shanghai law firm as a foreign legal advisor and later joined one of the oldest American law firms in China, helping foreign companies navigate the Chinese legal environment. He also led the legal team at a Hong Kong-based brand protection consultancy, spending most of his time out in the field, protecting clients against counterfeiters and fraudsters in Greater China, Southeast Asia and Latin America. In addition to his IP work, as a native Spanish speaker, Fred works closely with different Harris Sliwoski teams on Latin America and Spain matters. Fred also provides advice to cannabis industry participants and other businesses on import and export transactions. Fred is an ardent supporter of FC Barcelona—and would be even in the absence of Catalan forebears who immigrated to Puerto Rico in the mid-1800s. Harris Sliwoski Attorney Read more posts [email protected] Read More Intellectual Property/Branding, International Cannabis Law Related Posts September 25, 2026 DEA Enforcement in a Changing Cannabis Landscape: Rescheduling, Hemp, and What Comes Next September 17, 2026 The Supreme Court May Decide if Cannabis-Related Residency Requirements are Unconstitutional September 16, 2026 A $31.8 Million Cannabis-Related Verdict That a Federal Court Wouldn’t Enforce September 15, 2026 Jason Adelstone Moderates Federal Cannabis Policy Discussion at IgniteIt Denver September 11, 2026 Medical Marijuana in Schedule III Survives Its First Major Challenge September 10, 2026 How to Acquire a Colorado Cannabis License September 4, 2026 The Intoxicating Hemp Products Ban Was Delayed a Month. Now What? August 31, 2026 Is the Global Shift to the Right Threatening International Cannabis Reforms? August 28, 2026 Oregon Cannabis Roundup: Fall 2026 August 26, 2026 Five Bills Every California Cannabis Operator Needs to Track in 2026 August 14, 2026 California Cannabis Contracts After Rescheduling: Why Your Contracts Need a Second Look August 4, 2026 DCC License Conversions After Rescheduling: How and When to Split A/M Licenses in California August 3, 2026 The Contradictions of Cannabis Law: From the United States to International Treaties July 28, 2026 What California Operators Must Do After Rescheduling: DEA Registration, License Restructuring, and 280E July 24, 2026 Medical Marijuana Schedule III Litigation: The D.C. Circuit's First Major Test Leave a comment Cancel reply