Is Cannabis Inflation Proof?

Home | Canna Law Blog | Is Cannabis Inflation Proof? Table of Contents Toggle Inflation has been dominating the headlines lately. Prices for gasoline, food (e.g., beef, bacon, eggs), used cars and many other items have spiked over the past year. It seems like there is always breaking news of the latest shortages - baby formula, tampons, eggs, semiconductors, sriracha, lumber, bicycles, etc. Cannabis, however, has seemingly been immune to inflation as prices have actually declined in many states over the past year. Many factors are causing inflation generally, even if the phenomenon is simply described as "too much money chasing too few goods." And although many of these factors still have an impact on the cannabis industry, the unique supply and demand conditions of the cannabis market have prevented cannabis price increases and product shortages. Cannabis is defined by state -- and not national or international -- market conditions Cannabis is still illegal at the federal level. Cannabis cannot legally cross state borders even though two contiguous states may have legalized cannabis for medical or recreational use. The cannabis market is defined by how much cannabis can be cultivated, produced and sold in each state. In many states like California, Colorado, Oregon, and Washington, the number of cultivators is far greater than the number of licensed retailers. Despite strong demand, many states currently have an oversupply of licensed cannabis grown in-state that can only be sold in-state. When supply exceeds demands, the market prices of a product will be lowered by some companies just to remain competitive. COVID-19 factor With movie theaters and restaurants closed during the pandemic, many turned to cannabis to cope with social distancing stress. Although the COVID lockdowns stopped in-store sales for a while, online sales with curbside pickup and delivery options facilitated strong sales at the early stages of the pandemic. The recent easing of COVID restrictions and rebounding consumer demand for restaurants, movies and other entertainment has caused demand for cannabis to decline. Also, with inflation driving prices for essentials like food, rent, gasoline higher, consumers have less discretionary spending money available for cannabis. Supply chain disruptions Inflation has been driven by delays and increased cost for shipping containers, rail freight and trucking. International events such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and China’s zero-COVID policies have also fueled inflation surges. But these logistical and international factors have not impacted cannabis as much as other products because cannabis supply is limited to those in state. Sure, there are higher gasoline and freight charges for intra-state transport, but it doesn’t hurt as much as higher national or international transport charges. Cannabis cultivators had to deal with more supply chain issues as certain fertilizers became unavailable or much more expensive because of the Ukraine war. Grow lights, pots and other growing equipment were hit with increased costs from Trump tariffs on Chinese imports and delays in delivery caused by the backlog at U.S. ports. Although growers felt the brunt of these increased costs, they were not able to pass on these higher costs to processors, distributors and retailers as they risked being replaced by another growing who was willing to eat those costs and offer a lower price. Availability of black market unlicensed cannabis The cannabis market is unique in having a significant available supply of illegal, unlicensed cannabis. Legalization of cannabis by states should cause the illegal market for cannabis to fade to obscurity. But currently, retail prices for cannabis from licensed dispensaries are usually substantially higher than that sold on the black market. A key difference between legal and illegal cannabis lies in taxes that some states imposed not only on transactions from retailers to consumers, but also on transactions from cultivators to retailers. These taxes create a price differential that makes illegal cannabis an attractive option as unlicensed sellers offer product that is just as good (if not better) and lower priced than legal cannabis. The availability of high quality, lower priced illegal cannabis competes with legal cannabis, particularly with inflation pushing some consumers to pivot back to less expensive unlicensed product. The cannabis industry is facing a cost-price squeeze. As noted above, inflation continues to increase the cost of cultivating cannabis. But given the excess supply available in most states, those costs cannot be passed through higher prices to the customers. Retailers dare not risk increasing prices to consumers for fear of losing sales to their competitors who may not raise their prices. With cannabis demand softening as COVID restrictions ease, this cost-price squeeze likely will be felt most by cannabis cultivators, and some will not be able to survive this market phase. Inflation may not be reflected in higher cannabis prices, but inflation is most certainly having an impact on the cannabis industry, with some growers feeling the pain more than retailers. Check Out Our Cannabis Law Services Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn E-mail Comment Adams Lee Adams Lee has more than twenty years’ experience providing strategic advice and legal guidance on complex international trade and administrative regulatory matters to US and foreign companies, trade associations, and foreign governments. He advises companies in a broad range of industries on international trade remedy and trade policy issues. Adams brings a wealth of knowledge to Harris Sliwoski’s international trade practice. He is adept at quickly evaluating strategic options and developing the best comprehensive legal approach in light of relevant policy and case law. Beyond achieving significant DOC and ITC results that improve his clients’ competitive position, Adams helps them understand complex trade issues so they can make well-informed business decisions. Harris Sliwoski Attorney Read more posts [email protected] Read More Business Basics, Recreational Marijuana Related Posts September 25, 2026 DEA Enforcement in a Changing Cannabis Landscape: Rescheduling, Hemp, and What Comes Next September 17, 2026 The Supreme Court May Decide if Cannabis-Related Residency Requirements are Unconstitutional September 16, 2026 A $31.8 Million Cannabis-Related Verdict That a Federal Court Wouldn’t Enforce September 15, 2026 Jason Adelstone Moderates Federal Cannabis Policy Discussion at IgniteIt Denver September 11, 2026 Medical Marijuana in Schedule III Survives Its First Major Challenge September 10, 2026 How to Acquire a Colorado Cannabis License September 4, 2026 The Intoxicating Hemp Products Ban Was Delayed a Month. Now What? August 31, 2026 Is the Global Shift to the Right Threatening International Cannabis Reforms? August 28, 2026 Oregon Cannabis Roundup: Fall 2026 August 26, 2026 Five Bills Every California Cannabis Operator Needs to Track in 2026 August 14, 2026 California Cannabis Contracts After Rescheduling: Why Your Contracts Need a Second Look August 4, 2026 DCC License Conversions After Rescheduling: How and When to Split A/M Licenses in California August 3, 2026 The Contradictions of Cannabis Law: From the United States to International Treaties July 28, 2026 What California Operators Must Do After Rescheduling: DEA Registration, License Restructuring, and 280E July 24, 2026 Medical Marijuana Schedule III Litigation: The D.C. Circuit's First Major Test One response to “Is Cannabis Inflation Proof?” Fiat currency causes inflation. Nothing else. Technological change which leads to efficiency places a natural downward pressure on prices. As our industry matures we should be able to provide a lower cost product to consumers. Those who survive will be able to A. Become efficient producers, and B. pass some of the inflationary pressures from other COGS (labor, packaging, etc) on to consumers. Should be interesting and fun, but yeah fiat currency causes inflation. Nothing else. Reply Leave a comment Cancel reply