USPTO Expungement and Reexamination Proceedings

Home | HS Blog | USPTO Expungement and Reexamination Proceedings Table of Contents Toggle Pursuant to the Trademark Modernization Act (TMA), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has established expungement and reexamination proceedings for cancellation of a registration. These proceedings allow a third party to request the cancellation of a trademark registration, if the mark was never used in commerce, or if it was not used prior to the date on which the trademark applicant had to demonstrate use in commerce. The new expungement and reexamination proceedings offer an alternative to a petition for cancellation under 15 U.S.C. § 1064. For reasons described below, the new proceedings may be a more attractive pathway in certain situations. 1. Why Would Someone Want to Cancel Someone Else's Trademark Registration? Coming up with good trademarks is not easy. To get a sense of the challenge, imagine you are starting a new business that will offer goods or services to the public. Now think of a few possible names for your brand. Remember, this brand will be public-facing, so it's not just a matter of naming an LLC. Then look for those trademarks in the USPTO register and see how many are already registered. For those names on your list that are not registered, consider that perhaps they are not registered because they are similar to a registered trademark, or because they are descriptive, or because someone has common-law rights to them in one or more states. With all these limitations in place, a good trademark is very valuable. Obviously, if someone uses a good trademark before anyone else, it's only fair that they get the corresponding legal rights. But what if someone registered the mark but isn't using the trademark. Is it fair for them to be able to preclude others from using it? Congress doesn't think so. It provided legal avenues to seek the cancellation of registrations of trademarks that are not being used in the Trademark Act of 1946. The TMA now provides additional tool, which in principle should make things easier for those seeking cancellations on non-use grounds. 2. What's the Difference Between Expungement and Reexamination Proceedings? Not much. A petition for expungement is used in those cases where the mark has never been used in commerce. In turn, a reexamination petition must allege that the trademark was not in use on or before the "relevant date." The relevant date is basically that on which the applicant had to provide evidence of use (at the time of filing in the case of an application based on actual use). The facts of the matter will help determine which of the two options is more suitable. 3. What's the Problem with Petitions to Cancel? Petitions to cancel can be lengthy, involved and expensive. It has the feel of litigation, with parties required to make numerous filings during the proceedings, following certain deadlines. With the new expungement and reexamination proceedings, after the petitioner files the matter is entirely in the hands of the USPTO and the trademark owner. 4. So Expungement and Reexamination Proceedings Are the Way to Go, Right? Not always. In some cases a petition to cancel might be the only option, such as when the mark was once used in commerce, but later abandoned. Expungement and reexamination proceedings apply only to situations where the mark was never used, or was not in use on or before the date on which use had to be shown to USPTO. 5. If a Trademark Was Not in Use, How Did the Owner Show Use?! In the case of goods, probably the most common kind of specimen provided to USPTO to show use is a photo of a product bearing the trademark. However, a trademark owner might have physical products at hand before they are entered into commerce. Imagine your brother-in-law is really into home brewing, to the point where he designs and prints labels for his bottles. If he decided to file an application to register the brand name he's given his beer, he'd have no problem submitting a photo of a bottle bearing the trademark with his application. But does that means the mark is being used in commerce? Probably not. In the same way, a trademark applicant could make a label with the trademark and stick it on an unrelated product, or even photoshop the trademark into an image of an unmarked product. In the case of an entity with manufacturing capability, they could even make a single product for purposes of showing use. It is also important to remember that, to register a trademark with USPTO, the use in commerce must have taken place in the United States. Imagine an applicant that sells products bearing the trademark in question, but in a foreign country. One of those products could be produced as a specimen, but sales overseas do not constitute use in commerce for federal registration purposes. For businesses negatively impacted by improper registrations by owners that are not using their marks in commerce, expungement and reexamination proceedings offer an alternative to the traditional cancellation proceeding, one which may prove more cost-effective, faster, and simpler. Check Out Our Practice Areas Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn E-mail Comment Fred Rocafort Fred leads Harris Sliwoski’s intellectual property practice and is the coordinator of the firm’s international team. Much of Fred’s practice consists of helping cannabis businesses protect their brands. He also works with entrepreneurs and companies entering the Web3 space, a new frontier for IP law. Prior to joining Harris Sliwoski, Fred worked overseas for more than a decade, in both government and private sector roles. Fred is a regular contributor to the award-winning China Law Blog and Canna Law Blog. Fred began his career overseas as a U.S. consular officer in Guangzhou, China, where he advocated for fairer treatment of American companies and citizens in China and for stronger intellectual property rights enforcement. After entering the private sector, Fred worked at a Shanghai law firm as a foreign legal advisor and later joined one of the oldest American law firms in China, helping foreign companies navigate the Chinese legal environment. He also led the legal team at a Hong Kong-based brand protection consultancy, spending most of his time out in the field, protecting clients against counterfeiters and fraudsters in Greater China, Southeast Asia and Latin America. In addition to his IP work, as a native Spanish speaker, Fred works closely with different Harris Sliwoski teams on Latin America and Spain matters. Fred also provides advice to cannabis industry participants and other businesses on import and export transactions. Fred is an ardent supporter of FC Barcelona—and would be even in the absence of Catalan forebears who immigrated to Puerto Rico in the mid-1800s. Harris Sliwoski Attorney Read more posts [email protected] Read More Intellectual Property Law Related Posts August 10, 2026 Trademark Registration in Central America: How to Build a Country-by-Country Filing Strategy August 7, 2026 United States Trademark Ownership Errors: How Small Filing Mistakes Become Expensive Problems May 18, 2026 Registering a Trademark in Venezuela: What International Businesses Need to Know April 27, 2026 Deepfakes, Voice Cloning, and AI Impersonation: The Global Rules Are Already Here, and They Don't Agree April 23, 2026 DMCA Agent Requirements for Online Businesses April 21, 2026 Trade Secrets in the AI Economy: Why Businesses Need Stronger Protection Now March 31, 2026 Trademark Registration in Cuba: Why Companies Should Be Thinking Ahead March 18, 2026 Abandoned Trademark Blocking Your U.S. Trademark Application? Understanding TTAB Cancellations February 2, 2026 EU Expansion and the EUTM: Will Your EU Trademark Automatically Cover New Member States? December 22, 2025 How a Foreign Trademark Application or Registration Can Help You in the United States: Section 44(d) and Section 44(e) December 12, 2025 Registering a Trademark in Canada: What International Businesses Need to Know December 10, 2025 Negotiating Trademark Disputes: Protecting Your Brand Without Burning Cash December 8, 2025 Trade Secrets and How to Protect Your Most Valuable Information November 18, 2025 Ten IP Monetization Mistakes That Quietly Destroy Global Trademark Portfolio Value November 17, 2025 Registering Trademarks in Vietnam: What You Need to Know Leave a comment Cancel reply