The Case for International Arbitration

Home | HS Blog | The Case for International Arbitration As a secondary summary of what was emphasized during this year’s California International Arbitration Week, today’s post will cover why there seems to be growing consensus that arbitration is the superior choice of all dispute resolution options – and especially in the international context. The arbitration can be tailored to the parties’ specific issues and needs. While court litigation is governed by the federal or state rules of that jurisdiction, arbitration process rules can be modified to ensure efficiency. Examples of this include limiting the scope of the discovery process by reducing the amount of written requests that can be served, limiting the number of depositions that can be taken, or even agreeing to a set of “undisputed facts” so that trial time isn’t wasted. The possibilities are sort of endless, and they allow the parties and arbitrator(s) to decide what needs to be focused on – and what doesn’t. The parties can choose their decisionmakers. In addition to the ability to change the process, a huge benefit of arbitration is the ability to choose an arbitrator or panel of arbitrators with relevant expertise and knowledge. It’s clear that the biggest arbitration forums are growing pools of highly-qualified arbitrators with specific expertise. This is especially so important when dealing with technical issues, whether it’s in the pharmaceutical industry or the technology industry. Contrast that to a jury trial – juries are unlikely to be as familiar or knowledgeable as a whole. Therefore, arbitration is efficient. In most cases, because of the ability to tailor the process, arbitration is faster and correspondingly, less expensive. Furthermore, because arbitrators are in private practice, it is much more likely they will have more time than federal or state judges, who often have case loads that require foresight into several years. International arbitration is a neutral forum. This is especially important when two or more parties are from different countries. Seeking a “neutral” international arbitration forum can help avoid any “home court advantages” that could make a difference where things like patent rights vary by country. Arbitration is non-public. For companies that have sophisticated and proprietary technical information that they want kept confidential, arbitration is “non-public” (meaning, you can’t find arbitration documents online). In contrast, courts err on the side of disclosure and require motion practice when any one party seeks to seal court records. Where it makes sense, it is common for the parties to even deem the arbitration completely confidential. Enforcement of any arbitration award is relatively straightforward. Finally, it seems to also be more and more agreed that arbitral awards are easier to enforce in foreign countries under the New York Convention. Of course, there are narrow grounds to oppose, but generally, parties understand that if they submit to the arbitration process, the chance of appealing any decision is slim to none, which allows for finality and relief in most cases once that arbitration award is issued. Check Out Our Practice Areas Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn E-mail Comment Dan Harris Dan Harris is a founding member of Harris Sliwoski, an international law firm where he mostly represents companies doing business in emerging market countries. Most of his time is spent helping American and European companies navigate foreign countries by working with the international lawyers at his firm in setting up companies overseas (WFOEs, Subsidiaries, Rep Offices and Joint Ventures), drafting international contracts, protecting IP, and overseeing M&A transactions. In addition, Dan writes and speaks extensively on international law, with a focus on protecting foreign businesses in their overseas operations. He is also a prolific and widely-followed blogger, writing as the co-author of the award-winning China Law Blog. Harris Sliwoski Attorney Read more posts [email protected] Read More Litigation and Dispute Resolution Related Posts August 20, 2026 Oregon State Court Civil Discovery: No Interrogatories, No Routine Expert Reports. Litigate Accordingly. August 5, 2026 The Lawsuits I See Coming a Mile Away, and the One You're Walking Into Now August 3, 2026 Should Your Business Sue? Seven Questions to Ask Before Filing a Lawsuit July 31, 2026 The Court of Mom: What an Eight-Year-Old's Garage Sale Taught Me About Washington Partnership Law July 27, 2026 United States Litigation for Business Owners: The 101 April 22, 2026 Washington Bench Trial or Jury Trial? How the Choice Can Change Your Entire Case April 21, 2026 Trade Secrets in the AI Economy: Why Businesses Need Stronger Protection Now April 20, 2026 Washington State Arbitration Clauses: When They Help and When They Hurt April 10, 2026 The 8 Biggest Mistakes Foreign Companies Make in U.S. Litigation March 2, 2026 When Cartel Violence Disrupts a Puerto Vallarta Corporate Retreat: Can You Recover Your Deposit? February 23, 2026 Named in a Lawsuit You Had Nothing to Do With? Getting Out Is Harder Than You Think. February 22, 2026 What to Expect in a Mediation and How to Avoid Costly Mistakes February 6, 2026 Enforcing US Judgments in Spain: Recognition, Strategy, and Reality December 8, 2025 Trade Secrets and How to Protect Your Most Valuable Information November 14, 2025 Neil Young’s “Chrome Hearts” Band Faces Trademark Lawsuit: What It Means and How the Case Could Play Out Leave a comment Cancel reply