Global Trademark Protection Under the Madrid Protocol

Home | HS Blog | Global Trademark Protection Under the Madrid Protocol Table of Contents Toggle As more U.S. companies and individuals seek to sell their goods and services in foreign markets, it is important they obtain trademark protection in these markets. One way to minimize the cost of obtaining trademark protection abroad is to make use of the Madrid System. With the UAE's accession to the Madrid Protocol (which together with the separate Madrid Agreement form the Madrid System) earlier this year, the Madrid System now covers 125 countries, including the U.S., China, and the European Union (EU). 1. Cost savings Rather than file separate national applications in each country where trademark protection is sought, U.S. companies and individuals may apply for an International Registration (IR) with the Geneva-based World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), then extend that IR to one or more other Madrid System countries. The fees and costs associated with directly filing a national trademark application with the trademark office of a particular Madrid System country (including the fees and costs of local counsel) are avoided and replaced with the lower overall fees and costs of the Madrid System. Rather than incurring separate renewal fees and costs in each country, the owner of an IR can pay a single renewal fee to WIPO to cover renewals in all countries to which the IR has been designated. The same centralized administration and cost savings also apply to trademark assignments, mergers and name changes. 2. Obtaining an IR To be able to obtain an International Registration (IR), the applicant must be a national of, domiciled in, or have a real and effective commercial establishment in one of the Madrid member countries. An application for an IR must be based on an existing (base or home) application or registration in the applicant’s home country and the application must be the same as the basic application or registration (except that the specification of goods and services can be narrower, but cannot exceed the specification of goods and services of the base application or registration). An application at the time of filing must also designate one or more countries to which the IR will be extended. Additional countries may subsequently be added at any time. For example, a company domiciled in the U.S. may file an application for an IR with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) based on the company’s pending U.S. application or registration for the same mark and designate Japan and Mexico as countries to which the IR should be extended. If the application qualifies as to form, the USPTO will transmit the application to WIPO. If WIPO determines the application complies with all applicable formalities, WIPO will then transmit the application to the national trademark offices of Japan and Mexico, which will then have up to 18 months (longer in certain circumstances) to accept or reject the application for protection in their respective countries. By using the System, the applicant can avoid having to retain (and pay for) local counsel in both Mexico and in Japan to file a national application. It should be noted, however, that if the trademark office of a particular country objects to the Madrid System application, the applicant will normally need to retain local counsel to try to overcome the objection(s) with the local trademark office. 3. Obligation to use the mark Once registered, the IR is subject to national requirements regarding use of the mark in each country to which the IR has been designated. In most countries, a mark must be used within five years of the registration date. Thereafter, use of the mark should not be discontinued for any continuous period of more than five years. 4. Infringement of a trademark that is the subject of an IR An IR that has been accepted in a given country is entitled to the same protection as a national trademark registration. The same rules as apply to a national trademark registration will determine whether an IR is infringed, and any action to enforce the IR must be sought at the country level. Any relief granted for trademark infringement in a particular Madrid System country is limited to that country. 5. IR dependent on base (home) registration for five years An IR is dependent on the base registration (home) registration for a period of five years. Accordingly, any changes made to the base application or registration within that period will also apply to the IR in all countries. For example, if for any reason the base registration is cancelled during this period, the IR will no longer be effective. However, if the base registration is cancelled, the owner of the IR may convert the IR to national applications in each country to which the IR has been designated, and still maintain the filing (and therefore the priority) date of the original application. Based on the foregoing, the owner of an IR should take steps to ensure that the base registration remains valid during this 5-year period. 6. Term of validity of an IR An IR is valid for ten years and it is renewable for unlimited consecutive 10-year periods. 7. Your international branding strategy By using the Madrid System, trademark owners can avoid hiring local counsel to file national trademark applications and maintain the national registrations once they are issued. However, the process of obtaining an IR, then extending it to one or more countries, does involve some cost, so trademark owners typically need to extend an IR to at least 3-4 countries to realize cost savings as compared to filing national applications in the same countries. Trademark owners must also take into account the fact that the IR will be dependent on the base (home) registration for five years, and that other approaches may better fit the trademark owner’s particular circumstances. Owners should also be mindful of the restriction on assigning the IR to a party that is not a national of, domiciled in or does not have a real and effective commercial establishment in a Madrid country. Check Out Our Practice Areas Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn E-mail Comment Fred Rocafort Fred leads Harris Sliwoski’s intellectual property practice and is the coordinator of the firm’s international team. Much of Fred’s practice consists of helping cannabis businesses protect their brands. He also works with entrepreneurs and companies entering the Web3 space, a new frontier for IP law. Prior to joining Harris Sliwoski, Fred worked overseas for more than a decade, in both government and private sector roles. Fred is a regular contributor to the award-winning China Law Blog and Canna Law Blog. Fred began his career overseas as a U.S. consular officer in Guangzhou, China, where he advocated for fairer treatment of American companies and citizens in China and for stronger intellectual property rights enforcement. After entering the private sector, Fred worked at a Shanghai law firm as a foreign legal advisor and later joined one of the oldest American law firms in China, helping foreign companies navigate the Chinese legal environment. He also led the legal team at a Hong Kong-based brand protection consultancy, spending most of his time out in the field, protecting clients against counterfeiters and fraudsters in Greater China, Southeast Asia and Latin America. In addition to his IP work, as a native Spanish speaker, Fred works closely with different Harris Sliwoski teams on Latin America and Spain matters. Fred also provides advice to cannabis industry participants and other businesses on import and export transactions. Fred is an ardent supporter of FC Barcelona—and would be even in the absence of Catalan forebears who immigrated to Puerto Rico in the mid-1800s. Harris Sliwoski Attorney Read more posts [email protected] Read More Intellectual Property Law Related Posts August 10, 2026 Trademark Registration in Central America: How to Build a Country-by-Country Filing Strategy August 7, 2026 United States Trademark Ownership Errors: How Small Filing Mistakes Become Expensive Problems May 18, 2026 Registering a Trademark in Venezuela: What International Businesses Need to Know April 27, 2026 Deepfakes, Voice Cloning, and AI Impersonation: The Global Rules Are Already Here, and They Don't Agree April 23, 2026 DMCA Agent Requirements for Online Businesses April 21, 2026 Trade Secrets in the AI Economy: Why Businesses Need Stronger Protection Now March 31, 2026 Trademark Registration in Cuba: Why Companies Should Be Thinking Ahead March 18, 2026 Abandoned Trademark Blocking Your U.S. Trademark Application? Understanding TTAB Cancellations February 2, 2026 EU Expansion and the EUTM: Will Your EU Trademark Automatically Cover New Member States? December 22, 2025 How a Foreign Trademark Application or Registration Can Help You in the United States: Section 44(d) and Section 44(e) December 12, 2025 Registering a Trademark in Canada: What International Businesses Need to Know December 10, 2025 Negotiating Trademark Disputes: Protecting Your Brand Without Burning Cash December 8, 2025 Trade Secrets and How to Protect Your Most Valuable Information November 18, 2025 Ten IP Monetization Mistakes That Quietly Destroy Global Trademark Portfolio Value November 17, 2025 Registering Trademarks in Vietnam: What You Need to Know Leave a comment Cancel reply