Fowl Play: The Frisby Fried Chicken Trademark Dispute

Home | HS Blog | Fowl Play: The Frisby Fried Chicken Trademark Dispute Table of Contents Toggle Frisby Trademark Fight Highlights Key Risks for Global Brands A European trademark dispute is heating up over the use of the Frisby name, pitting a well-known Colombian fast-food chain against a Spanish company that successfully registered the Frisby trademark with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). (Having put up with the title, we promise that we will not subject our readers to further puns relating to Frisby's main product.) What’s at Stake for the Colombian Original The outcome could have serious implications. If the Spanish company (Frisby España) prevails, Frisby S.A. BIC (Frisby Colombia) may face significant obstacles to expanding into the European market—despite its decades-long history in the fast-food industry. To put this in perspective: imagine if Burger King tried to enter a new country, only to find its name already registered by someone else. In fact, that’s exactly what happened in Australia, where the chain had to operate under a different name—Hungry Jack's—for years. How EU Trademark Rules Created an Opening Frisby Colombia has built a strong reputation as one of the country’s pioneering fast-food franchises. It holds trademark rights in several jurisdictions and has cultivated a widely recognized brand. But when Frisby España registered the word mark "Frisby" with EUIPO in 2024, a trademark conflict was set in motion. You might assume that Frisby Colombia simply failed to register its trademark in Europe. But the reality is a bit more nuanced. In fact, Frisby Colombia did file a successful trademark application in 2004, for design mark featuring its chicken mascot and the word "Frisby": The issue lies in how the EUIPO handles trademark applications. Unlike the USPTO, which examines trademark applications for a likelihood of confusion with prior registrations and applications (known as relative grounds for refusal), the EUIPO does not do so on its own initiative. In the EU, relative grounds are only considered if raised by the owner of an earlier right through an opposition or cancellation proceeding. Why Timing—and Monitoring—Matters Unfortunately for Frisby Colombia, it appears they did not timely oppose the Spanish application—allowing Frisby España to secure rights to the "Frisby" word mark in the EU. It's unclear why Frisby Colombia failed to file a timely opposition, but at this stage, its remaining options may include filing a cancellation action or negotiating a coexistence agreement with Frisby España. These are often complex and uphill battles—especially once rights have been formally granted—highlighting the importance of early monitoring and enforcement. Lessons for Brand Owners Whether you're a global brand or a local business with international aspirations, the Frisby case offers some important takeaways: 1. Monitor Trademark Activity—Including in Future Markets Keep an eye on key jurisdictions—even those where you're not yet active. A registration filed today can become a serious hurdle tomorrow. And with trademark registrations cover 27 countries, few jurisdictions are as important to global brands as the EU. 2. Oppose Problematic Applications Promptly Most jurisdictions, including the EU, have strict deadlines for filing oppositions. If you miss the window, even a strong prior use may not be enough to undo a registration. 3. Understand EUIPO’s Role Unlike the USPTO, EUIPO does not reject confusingly similar marks on its own. It’s up to trademark owners to monitor and enforce their rights. If you don’t act, no one else will. Final Thoughts (and a Slightly Dark Chicken Joke) The Frisby dispute is a powerful example of how global brand protection requires more than just registering trademarks. While that is an important step, brands need to stay on top of activity by other parties that could threaten its trademark rights. Slightly off-topic, is anyone else mildly disturbed by the fact that el pollo Frisby is encouraging us to eat its own kind? Chick-fil-A really had the right idea with its cows. h/t to Matthew Memberg for putting this one on our radar. Check Out Our Practice Areas Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn E-mail Comment Fred Rocafort Fred leads Harris Sliwoski’s intellectual property practice and is the coordinator of the firm’s international team. Much of Fred’s practice consists of helping cannabis businesses protect their brands. He also works with entrepreneurs and companies entering the Web3 space, a new frontier for IP law. Prior to joining Harris Sliwoski, Fred worked overseas for more than a decade, in both government and private sector roles. Fred is a regular contributor to the award-winning China Law Blog and Canna Law Blog. Fred began his career overseas as a U.S. consular officer in Guangzhou, China, where he advocated for fairer treatment of American companies and citizens in China and for stronger intellectual property rights enforcement. After entering the private sector, Fred worked at a Shanghai law firm as a foreign legal advisor and later joined one of the oldest American law firms in China, helping foreign companies navigate the Chinese legal environment. He also led the legal team at a Hong Kong-based brand protection consultancy, spending most of his time out in the field, protecting clients against counterfeiters and fraudsters in Greater China, Southeast Asia and Latin America. In addition to his IP work, as a native Spanish speaker, Fred works closely with different Harris Sliwoski teams on Latin America and Spain matters. Fred also provides advice to cannabis industry participants and other businesses on import and export transactions. Fred is an ardent supporter of FC Barcelona—and would be even in the absence of Catalan forebears who immigrated to Puerto Rico in the mid-1800s. Harris Sliwoski Attorney Read more posts [email protected] Read More Hospitality, Intellectual Property Law, Spain, Trademarks Related Posts September 14, 2026 Colorado Can Have Higher Tipped Minimum Wages OR a Tipping Culture. Not Both. August 31, 2026 Taking Your Restaurant International: A Legal Guide to Global Restaurant Expansion August 10, 2026 Trademark Registration in Central America: How to Build a Country-by-Country Filing Strategy August 7, 2026 United States Trademark Ownership Errors: How Small Filing Mistakes Become Expensive Problems June 23, 2026 Doing Business in Spain: A Legal Guide for Foreign Companies and U.S. Businesses June 18, 2026 Spain Legal Fees, Court Costs, and Litigation Budgets: A Guide for Foreign Companies May 18, 2026 Registering a Trademark in Venezuela: What International Businesses Need to Know May 5, 2026 Buying Property in Spain: What Foreign Buyers Need to Know Before They Sign April 27, 2026 Deepfakes, Voice Cloning, and AI Impersonation: The Global Rules Are Already Here, and They Don't Agree April 23, 2026 DMCA Agent Requirements for Online Businesses April 21, 2026 Trade Secrets in the AI Economy: Why Businesses Need Stronger Protection Now March 31, 2026 Trademark Registration in Cuba: Why Companies Should Be Thinking Ahead March 18, 2026 Abandoned Trademark Blocking Your U.S. Trademark Application? Understanding TTAB Cancellations March 2, 2026 When Cartel Violence Disrupts a Puerto Vallarta Corporate Retreat: Can You Recover Your Deposit? February 2, 2026 EU Expansion and the EUTM: Will Your EU Trademark Automatically Cover New Member States? Leave a comment Cancel reply