Legal Trademark Protection With The Global Marketplace

Home | HS Blog | Trademark Protection In The Global Marketplace Trademarks are among the most important assets of any company. Indeed, if it weren’t for trademarks, customers would be unlikely to even find a company’s products. Naturally, then, most U.S. companies want to protect these essential and valuable assets to the greatest extent possible and therefore make sure that they are registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). But many companies stop there, thinking their job complete. It does not occur to them that trademark rights are territorial and that owning a United States trademark registration creates no rights whatsoever outside the U.S. borders. This issue often comes to light only after a problem has been encountered, such as someone selling knockoffs of the trademark owner’s products in another country. If the company is fortunate, corrective action is still possible. For many, however, it may be too late and no legal remedy exists. For such a company, someone else now owns “its” trademarks in that other country (or countries) and the only option, if any, is to purchase them "back" from the foreign owner, usually at a high price. Though being forced to buy “your” own trademark might sound like extortion, in most countries this is perfectly legal. This is because most countries (but not the United States) grant trademark rights to the “first to file” for the trademark not to the “first to use” the mark as in the United States. The first company to file an application to register a trademark, whether or not someone else is already using it, becomes the trademark owner in that country. For that reason, trademark registration overseas can be even more important than in the United States. First of all, without a registration in a particular jurisdiction, a U.S. trademark owner will be unable to prevent someone else from using its trademark. Moreover, to add insult to injury, if that other party has registered the U.S. company’s trademark in a foreign country, the U.S. company could even be prevented from using the trademark in that foreign country and it could even be found liable for trademark infringement were it to do so! It is therefore not surprising that in many countries (particularly in Latin America and Asia) there are people on the prowl for successful emerging American companies so they can quickly register those American company’s trademarks first in their own country. Later, when the American trademark owner is ready to expand into that country, it learns someone else already owns its trademarks there. These opportunists then typically seek to sell the trademark “back” to the U.S. company. The negotiated price can vary considerably, but it virtually always will be many times more than it would have cost the U.S. company to register it originally. The best way for a trademark owner to protect itself from these dangers is by registering its marks in as many jurisdictions as possible. But since there are more than 200 countries in the world today — most with their own trademark registers, application procedures and, of course, costs — registering in all jurisdictions is impossible for all but the largest multinationals. Until recently, a trademark owner wanting to fully protect its marks around the world had no choice but to file individual trademark applications in each of those jurisdictions. Though there is still no such thing as a “global trademark registration” two developments have helped reduce the burden on trademark owners. In 1996, the European Community trade mark (now known as the European Union trade marks or EUTM), came into being and allowed trademark owners to secure protection in all 27 European Union member states via a single trademark application. The EUTM is a more economical choice for a company needs trademark protection in several EU countries. The second development is the continuing expansion of the Madrid System (created by two separate treaties, the Madrid Agreement and the Madrid Protocol, with partially overlapping contracting parties). Under the Madrid System, if you own a trademark registration in a member country, you can apply for an International Registration and expand your protection, in a single application, to up to 126 countries (the number is less when the original registration is in a country that is a signatory to only the Protocol (e.g., the United States) or the Agreement. In addition to these two vehicles, the Paris Convention – to which most of the world, including the United States, belongs — can also sometimes be helpful. Under this Convention, trademark owners can take advantage of a six-month “priority period” to file for a new trademark in one member country and then have a six-month window to file for the same trademark in any other member countries and have those later applications treated as if they had been filed at the same time as the first one. By way of example, an American company can file an application with the USPTO today for a new trademark, then wait up to six months to file elsewhere without any concern that some enterprising individual overseas might file a preemptive application for the mark. This delay period can be a useful tool for trademark owners with cash flow issues, such as many startup companies. All three of these mechanisms (EUTM, Madrid and Paris) can be used together. For example, a company may file an application in the United States for a new trademark and then, under the Paris Convention, wait close to six months before filing with the USPTO an application for an International Registration under Madrid and, in that application, designate the European Union as one of the jurisdictions in which protection is desired. Despite these mechanisms, protecting every trademark in every country is beyond the budget of all but a select group of companies. So how should a company choose where to seek protection first? When we do this analysis, we analyze a host of factors. First, where does the company have its greatest foreign sales? Certainly it makes more sense to incur the fees and costs to register a trademark in a country in which sales exceed $1 million than in a country in which sales are less than $10,000. In which countries would the emergence of counterfeits hurt the company the most? Relatedly, in which countries is the emergence of knockoffs more likely in the first place? Where does the company have manufacturing facilities (especially if the company uses outside vendors to manufacture its products)? Are there countries with notorious counterfeiting problems in the trademark owner’s industry? Finally, and perhaps most importantly, in which jurisdictions would the company suffer the greatest damage if it were precluded from using its trademarks because someone else registers them first? Once these questions are answered our international trademark attorneys will work with the company to adopt a plan to secure its trademark protection in stages, covering the most important markets first, then another group in six or twelve months, and so on. Though this will mean temporary gaps in trademark protection, these gaps will be the result of a conscious business decision, rather than a failure to identify the issues at all. Ignorance may be bliss but, at least in the trademark world, what you don’t know can indeed hurt you. Check Out Our Practice Areas Share Twitter Facebook LinkedIn E-mail Comment Fred Rocafort Fred leads Harris Sliwoski’s intellectual property practice and is the coordinator of the firm’s international team. Much of Fred’s practice consists of helping cannabis businesses protect their brands. He also works with entrepreneurs and companies entering the Web3 space, a new frontier for IP law. Prior to joining Harris Sliwoski, Fred worked overseas for more than a decade, in both government and private sector roles. Fred is a regular contributor to the award-winning China Law Blog and Canna Law Blog. Fred began his career overseas as a U.S. consular officer in Guangzhou, China, where he advocated for fairer treatment of American companies and citizens in China and for stronger intellectual property rights enforcement. After entering the private sector, Fred worked at a Shanghai law firm as a foreign legal advisor and later joined one of the oldest American law firms in China, helping foreign companies navigate the Chinese legal environment. He also led the legal team at a Hong Kong-based brand protection consultancy, spending most of his time out in the field, protecting clients against counterfeiters and fraudsters in Greater China, Southeast Asia and Latin America. In addition to his IP work, as a native Spanish speaker, Fred works closely with different Harris Sliwoski teams on Latin America and Spain matters. Fred also provides advice to cannabis industry participants and other businesses on import and export transactions. Fred is an ardent supporter of FC Barcelona—and would be even in the absence of Catalan forebears who immigrated to Puerto Rico in the mid-1800s. Harris Sliwoski Attorney Read more posts [email protected] Read More Intellectual Property Law Related Posts August 10, 2026 Trademark Registration in Central America: How to Build a Country-by-Country Filing Strategy August 7, 2026 United States Trademark Ownership Errors: How Small Filing Mistakes Become Expensive Problems May 18, 2026 Registering a Trademark in Venezuela: What International Businesses Need to Know April 27, 2026 Deepfakes, Voice Cloning, and AI Impersonation: The Global Rules Are Already Here, and They Don't Agree April 23, 2026 DMCA Agent Requirements for Online Businesses April 21, 2026 Trade Secrets in the AI Economy: Why Businesses Need Stronger Protection Now March 31, 2026 Trademark Registration in Cuba: Why Companies Should Be Thinking Ahead March 18, 2026 Abandoned Trademark Blocking Your U.S. Trademark Application? Understanding TTAB Cancellations February 2, 2026 EU Expansion and the EUTM: Will Your EU Trademark Automatically Cover New Member States? December 22, 2025 How a Foreign Trademark Application or Registration Can Help You in the United States: Section 44(d) and Section 44(e) December 12, 2025 Registering a Trademark in Canada: What International Businesses Need to Know December 10, 2025 Negotiating Trademark Disputes: Protecting Your Brand Without Burning Cash December 8, 2025 Trade Secrets and How to Protect Your Most Valuable Information November 18, 2025 Ten IP Monetization Mistakes That Quietly Destroy Global Trademark Portfolio Value November 17, 2025 Registering Trademarks in Vietnam: What You Need to Know Leave a comment Cancel reply